[Iptel] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3966 (4376)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 26 May 2015 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: iptel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iptel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4DF1AC3DC for <iptel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Za_ZED2L78v5 for <iptel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BFD1A8A7F for <iptel@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6666D180207; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: hgs@cs.columbia.edu, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, jdrosen@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150526154737.6666D180207@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 08:47:37 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iptel/oII8pvlvJY0e4suQq3JxrmNL7k4>
Cc: iptel@ietf.org, ietf.shinji@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Iptel] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3966 (4376)
X-BeenThere: iptel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Telephony <iptel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iptel/>
List-Post: <mailto:iptel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 15:49:46 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3966,
"The tel URI for Telephone Numbers".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3966&eid=4376

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: OKUMURA Shinji <ietf.shinji@gmail.com>

Section: 3

Original Text
-------------
phonedigit           = DIGIT / [ visual-separator ]
phonedigit-hex       = HEXDIG / "*" / "#" / [ visual-separator ]


Corrected Text
--------------
phonedigit           = DIGIT / visual-separator;
phonedigit-hex       = HEXDIG / "*" / "#" / visual-separator;


Notes
-----
An optional and alternative rule is typically meaningless.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC3966 (draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The tel URI for Telephone Numbers
Publication Date    : December 2004
Author(s)           : H. Schulzrinne
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IP Telephony
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG