IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IAB last call... Re: [ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document

Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> Wed, 11 January 2006 11:35 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EweFu-0008E9-6u; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:35:06 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EweFq-0008DS-RV; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:35:05 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA04054; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:33:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EweMj-0007iK-7Z; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:42:10 -0500
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2006 03:34:51 -0800
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k0BBYojt029038; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:34:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:34:50 -0500
Received: from [10.86.242.249] ([10.86.242.249]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:34:49 -0500
Message-ID: <43C4ED58.8040407@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:34:48 -0500
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050923 Thunderbird/1.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Subject: Re: IAB last call... Re: [ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document
References: <200601091455.k09Et2c2020603@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <F5098923-4140-47F6-BEA1-DEB2CE368C0A@kurtis.pp.se> <DFC29EE1-90BD-4806-9906-EA0ED2CCD57C@cs.ucla.edu>
In-Reply-To: <DFC29EE1-90BD-4806-9906-EA0ED2CCD57C@cs.ucla.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2006 11:34:49.0532 (UTC) FILETIME=[07F07FC0:01C616A3]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, IAB IAB <iab@ietf.org>, Margaret Wasserman <MRW@devicescape.com>, Bradner Scott <sob@harvard.edu>, ipv6-dir@ietf.org, Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
X-BeenThere: ipv6-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IPv6 Directorate <ipv6-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org

On 01/11/2006 01:25 AM, Lixia Zhang allegedly wrote:
> Couple specific comments:
> - if one wants to list RSVP standards: the base spec is missing from 
> the current list:
> 
>    [RFC 2205] "Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) --
>                Version 1 Functional Specification"

Added

> - About how to position SCTP: this version from Kurtis did not have  any
> mentioning about SCTP, but if we say anything at all, I would  suggest a
> statement in a positive way (perhaps something like "While  SCTP can be
> an effective approach to support multihoming at transport  protocol
> level, IETF is developing general solutions to support  multihoming at
> IP level").
> I too heard about ITU-T being a big fan of SCTP, like Thomas, I'd  tempt
> to say let them.

I understand that SCTP is very popular because of its success in
carrying SS7.

_______________________________________________
ipv6-dir mailing list
ipv6-dir@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email