Re: IAB last call... Re: [ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document

"Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com> Mon, 09 January 2006 16:55 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ew0JL-0007BW-VU; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:55:59 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ew0EQ-0006MQ-BF; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:50:54 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA00922; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:49:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mgw-ext03.nokia.com ([131.228.20.95]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ew0Kw-0003RK-85; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:57:39 -0500
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-ext03.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k09GkKNa028441; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:46:23 +0200
Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:50:43 +0200
Received: from esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.118]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:50:43 +0200
Received: from 172.21.155.53 ([172.21.155.53]) by esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.118]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:50:42 +0000
Received: from essrv103nok155120.ntc.nokia.com by esebe100.noe.nokia.com; 09 Jan 2006 18:50:42 +0200
Subject: Re: IAB last call... Re: [ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document
From: "Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>
To: ext Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <43C28D96.30005@cisco.com>
References: <200601091554.k09FsiEK005931@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <43C28D96.30005@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: NET/ST/IED
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:50:42 +0200
Message-Id: <1136825442.7079.26.camel@essrv103nok155120.ntc.nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-16.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jan 2006 16:50:43.0503 (UTC) FILETIME=[D48F73F0:01C6153C]
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1e48a527f609d1be2bc8d8a70eb76cb
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:55:56 -0500
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "<john.loughney@nokia.com> (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) John" <john.loughney@nokia.com>, IAB IAB <iab@ietf.org>, Margaret Wasserman <MRW@devicescape.com>, Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>, Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, Bradner Scott <sob@harvard.edu>, ipv6-dir@ietf.org, Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IPv6 Directorate <ipv6-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

I agree with Scott that we don't really have to wait for _exact_
questions before providing them an answer. I think providing them a
bigger answer to them that they in paper asked for is just ok.

However, I would be careful to distinguish the work that is already done
in the IETF (RFCs), in WGs, just started, and what somebody has deployed
in the Internet based on IETF protocols. I think IETF's role is to
describe what is done and what has consensus at least as a direction.
More forward than that can be just commented that IETF is working on it
(with no current consensus on details).

Cheers,

Jonne.
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:21 -0500, ext Scott W Brim wrote:
> On 01/09/2006 10:54 AM, Thomas Narten allegedly wrote:
> > Part of what is bugging me here is that we are responding to a very
> > vague and open request for some sort of information from ITU-T. I
> > don't know what their hot buttons are and what we need to be
> > commenting on. So, my starting point was to take a relatively narrow
> > reading of their request and try to not provide info on stuff they
> > didn't ask about. Otherwise, where does it end? Besides, we want them
> > to come to us with _specific_ questions.
> 
> It ends where we take it.  One alternative is we are administrative
> clerks from a "protocol shop" and provide information as requested on
> form 7.  Another is that this is one step toward having the IETF seen
> as the clear leader on vision and strategy.  There are lots of
> possible endings, depending on where you want it to go.  I suggest
> choosing the ultimate goal, and making sure the liaison is a step in
> that direction.
> 
> As for what they are asking, I interpreted them in previous mail,
> which I can dig up if you need it.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ipv6-dir mailing list
> ipv6-dir@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir

_______________________________________________
ipv6-dir mailing list
ipv6-dir@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir