Re: IAB last call... Re: [ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document

Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com> Mon, 09 January 2006 16:55 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ew0JL-0007B8-RB; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:55:59 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Evyj1-000283-9A; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:14:23 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA20716; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:13:04 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200601091513.KAA20716@ietf.org>
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EvypW-0007be-Iv; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:21:07 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=psg.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mankin@psg.com>) id 1Evyip-000HUE-Np; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:14:11 +0000
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: IAB last call... Re: [ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:14:11 -0800
From: Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:55:56 -0500
Cc: "<john.loughney@nokia.com> (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) John" <john.loughney@nokia.com>, Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>, IAB IAB <iab@ietf.org>, ipv6-dir@ietf.org, Margaret Wasserman <MRW@devicescape.com>, mankin@psg.com, Bradner Scott <sob@harvard.edu>, Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>, Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
X-BeenThere: ipv6-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IPv6 Directorate <ipv6-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir>, <mailto:ipv6-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-dir-bounces@ietf.org

I regret not making time to comment on this to date, but there're 
a couple of points in Thomas's mail that I want to support
and one I want to disagree with -

Pro:

I like that Thomas add the Y1541 NSIS document to the NSIS list;
seems like good diplomacy.

I agree with Thomas that it's not appropriate to reference the
non-WG nsis-tunnel work.  But btw, I think the overall NSIS section
is very good.

Con:

> > In addition to this effort, other technologies in the IETF support
> > some form of multihoming, most notably HIP, which is an experimental
> > protocol with many similarities to shim6, and SCTP. The reason SCTP
> > was not chosen as a generic approach to multihoming was that it
> > assumes SCTP as the transport layer protocol.
> 
> Drop the above.

I disagree, though perhaps Thomas is reacting to the lack of reference
to IPv6 in the paragraph.  ITU NGN has many proposals which apply
SCTP broadly, and I believe it's worth our stating that we think
this is not appropriate.  

Allison

_______________________________________________
ipv6-dir mailing list
ipv6-dir@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir