Re: IAB last call... Re: [ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document

Excellent!  As you're sending it, I think it's fine to take
the IAB labelling off it (it became "IETF / IAB" at some point
when it looked like we were going to send it).

Leslie.

Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> Oops, I hadn't seen this when I said that I would send it...  Leslie,
> please let me know when the IAB is done noodling, and I will review/send
> whatever pops out.
> 
> Margaret 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Leslie Daigle [mailto:leslie@thinkingcat.com] 
>>Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 4:42 PM
>>To: Kurt Erik Lindqvist; IAB IAB
>>Cc: Scott W Brim; john.loughney@nokia.com; Margaret 
>>Wasserman; Bradner Scott; ipv6-dir@ietf.org
>>Subject: IAB last call... Re: [ipv6-dir] Re: Updated document
>>
>>
>>(I expect someone is going to have to spring this from the 
>>IPv6 directorate mailing list, as I am not a member).
>>
>>I've read today's discussion of this document -- I see 
>>concerns, but no suggested text.  Also, I understand that 
>>Kurtis has not heard back from Margaret re. shipping this, so 
>>I'm willing to send it but require further IAB nodding.
>>
>>To deal with the concerns I've seen raised, I propose to 
>>change the introductory paragraph (currently shown as a 
>>change in this draft) to:
>>
>>
>>>Introduction
>>>
>>>The IETF thanks the Q.9/13 for their liaison statement
>>>(https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file182.pdf) and 
>>>interest on IPv6 issues related to NGN. We have reviewed 
>>
>>the liaison 
>>
>>>statement with the most relevant experts and prepared this response 
>>>based on those experts' comments. We have aimed to provide an 
>>>informative response for your guidance in further 
>>
>>collaboration, and 
>>
>>>have endeavoured to be clear where works are "in progress". We also 
>>>appreciate your understanding that, while this is the 
>>
>>collected advice 
>>
>>>from several experts, it is neither an IAB statement nor an 
>>
>>official 
>>
>>>IETF consensus publication.
>>
>>
>>
>>I'll ask for a short last call within the IAB -- the document 
>>has not substantively changed from the earlier version as 
>>seen.  So, please let me/Kurtis know by noon Monday (US-ET) 
>>if this is a statement you, as IAB members, are willing to support.
>>
>>
>>Leslie.
>>
>>
>>Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
>>
>>>On 5 jan 2006, at 22.03, Leslie Daigle wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>WRT from whom -- I'm happy if it comes from Margaret as AD of the 
>>>>implicated WGs, and if need be I can help facilitate 
>>
>>things with the 
>>
>>>>Tool.
>>>
>>>
>>>Ok, Scott's text now with Leslie's suggested pre-amble. Margaret, I 
>>>hope you are fine with sending this?
>>>
>>>Can I consider my self done with this now? I haven't seen any  
>>>comments on this so I guess we are?
>>>
>>>
>>>BTW, I hope this is Margaret's correct email address? She should  
>>>anyway be on the ipv6-dir mailinglist....
>>>
>>>- kurtis -
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
ipv6-dir mailing list
ipv6-dir@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-dir