Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt

John Leslie <john@jlc.net> Tue, 25 June 2013 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jlc.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB5021F9F80 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.614
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.614 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.985, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kWEPgNol4QE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.jlc.net (mailhost.jlc.net [199.201.159.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D865B21F9302 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mailhost.jlc.net (Postfix, from userid 104) id 3D35E33C22; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:55:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:55:32 -0400
From: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Message-ID: <20130625125532.GE50067@verdi>
References: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85151@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C32FA9.1090207@gmail.com> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85F38@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20130624204008.GB3647@virgo.local> <20130624205226.GC3647@virgo.local> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F8761C@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C902DC.9000408@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51C902DC.9000408@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:55:49 -0000

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If it's a statement of fact, it shouldn't use RFC 2119 language. It
> should simply state the truth: "Network operators might filter IPv6
> fragments."

   +1

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>