IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9429120920 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 02:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.733
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.733 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2DBeNh39LuUk for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 02:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E344A12091E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 02:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x7K9h07S041663 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:43:00 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A5ADD203141 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:43:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90539202FBE for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:43:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.166.86.39] ([132.166.86.39]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x7K9h0Wc027825 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:43:00 +0200
Subject: Re: Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <20190820043742.1EB8C888446@ary.qy>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <253cd824-3e4e-1812-b6c7-9441014ea78f@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:43:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190820043742.1EB8C888446@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/-Y_Ty58pRAMdhD6tty3GO80kgdY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 09:43:05 -0000


Le 20/08/2019 à 06:37, John Levine a écrit :
[...]  It's really nice that every network is a /64, and we
> don't have to fool around with CIDR boundaries.

I shut up, but it's not that way.  There are CIDR boundaries and every 
network is not a 64.

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email