Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea
"john leddy.net" <john@leddy.net> Wed, 26 February 2020 20:22 UTC
Return-Path: <john@leddy.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E433A138B;
Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:22:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id H8znptTzvE6T; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:22:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atl4mhob22.registeredsite.com (atl4mhob22.registeredsite.com
[209.17.115.116])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A663A1386;
Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:22:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atl4oxapp107 ([10.30.71.144])
by atl4mhob22.registeredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 01QKM2bX025529
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:22:02 -0500
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:22:02 -0500 (EST)
From: "john leddy.net" <john@leddy.net>
Reply-To: "john leddy.net" <john@leddy.net>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>,
Sander Steffann <sander@retevia.net>
Cc: spring@ietf.org, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <626312047.530170.1582748522771@webmail.networksolutionsemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e0fb41cc-b830-3c72-c03d-591f9ff0722b@si6networks.com>
References: <7B51F0BE-CE40-42B8-9D87-0B764B6E00C5@steffann.nl>
<47B4D89B-D752-4F4C-8226-41FCB0A610F0@retevia.net>
<CAOj+MMGYtGOi2n_E57TTfD_3kWvkqWGWhhfev4Z2GVwJD5oSnQ@mail.gmail.com>
<e0fb41cc-b830-3c72-c03d-591f9ff0722b@si6networks.com>
Subject: Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.0-Rev28
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Archived-At:
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/-YoRXJYJkRksenu4-R4a14_Z7Ic>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>,
<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>,
<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:22:06 -0000
I would suggest that people read RFC 7282 - "On Consensus and Humming in the IETF"... My question is: How do you reach Consensus when the complaint is about how many milliseconds it takes to shoot down a proposal? Is this about the proposal or the vendor involved? > > A number of us wonder how many milliseconds it would have taken for this > proposal to be shot down if it wasn't being pushed by a big vendor. > > Thanks, > -- > Fernando Gont > SI6 Networks > e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com > PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
- RE: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Andrew Alston
- RE: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea john leddy.net
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea john leddy.net
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] Is srv6 PSP a good idea Robert Raszuk