Stewart Bryant's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with COMMENT)

["Stewart Bryant" <[e-mail]>]

Stewart Bryant has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

As Adrian says, this does not look like it impacts the routing systems so
based on a quick skim, no objection.

I am, however, left pondering as to whether a simple call to the system
RNG wouldn't work well enough most of the time.