Re: Status of <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> in AUTH48

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Sun, 12 February 2017 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A241D129407 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 14:07:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dCAjLBCYra00 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 14:07:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF843128BA2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 14:07:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:1291:200:42e::2] (cl-1071.udi-01.br.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:1291:200:42e::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54139828F8; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 23:07:52 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Status of <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> in AUTH48
To: otroan@employees.org
References: <C9FDAEB9-9F79-4186-9C48-5F44E5E07235@gmail.com> <2c970446-545b-edc7-178d-5526f2712eda@si6networks.com> <9E1C2279-A297-4CB0-BAA7-2FA20A566057@employees.org>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <b116701b-328f-17f4-b222-65a81285cf70@si6networks.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 19:07:44 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9E1C2279-A297-4CB0-BAA7-2FA20A566057@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/0JwYD2SS9kMzGOgupAPaRFmRJSg>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:07:56 -0000

On 02/12/2017 06:50 PM, otroan@employees.org wrote:
> Fernando,
> 
> [...]
> 
>> Me, I have always tried, to the extent that is possible, to give enough
>> credit when it's deserved, because I understand that the product of my
>> work heavily relies on the work, help, and support of other people.
> 
> I encourage you to read up on the IETF process.
> The document is not yours. When a document is adopted by a working group change control is turned over to the working group.

I never challenged that. For instance, what's in the upcoming RFC does
not reflect 100% my view -- of course, it reflects what seemed to be wg
consensus, and I never tried to change that.

It is the first time that I see a "consensus call" on acknowledgements.
That's it.

But certainly, whatever the outcome, I'll respect it.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492