Re: Why /64

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 28 October 2013 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C667021F994A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.068, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iEteUlVbyEwi for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DC511E8243 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ar20so11068825iec.12 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=lQSN7SW+YUn9JUjoPBlDGg/OVrg07N+MNUBQh8Uzcb4=; b=kBus1DN3trM5GN++ZxPrqguEsJPC20E5yJtBZE0sudgG5HteV/tR76PkDy2rAuZ/6f +6dpMZt5YIFbsAPO4GbXbPRa3s9q1i4qo9wx5MWsO94uzJ17zSmiWP+3CU6KUCsQgbhq IvrUref7MWGyFnfXN/NVFJxGxHxuZqalSxUWRJXffQ5O5bQDgEppnNf7O0J0KF001a/F Z+s2FdEf0B19n1yU5PkIbiIK/dZuWFdrbcwELsjp6w/N56aMZCcOaw9/EbJw2pVhsYCO qN9dFNaZ49LG4P04UErUtDLBFVEzKXgmoepSnIIW/YqYWv2hLuc7CZsVt0Xu6mFZDFwP rezg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=lQSN7SW+YUn9JUjoPBlDGg/OVrg07N+MNUBQh8Uzcb4=; b=h1/C6PugPxCcsHyD7ej6YTDyMSOEhLiUA9ruGohM2bPZ9H9dqf658qGXJXLIU7EZa8 cobp7CZzlhB+6KXknXWJzhe/VyscEHfjbPsdGv5SxiKfIPMMz02NWa/sYjmaQ1OhYmec VXqQ16ZGTpZ3+b1AD3Jy99cRlGSPiDXg22ibMU/kG+/xDOsbfjN9jf55PESO1srBgBwG DXvr++vZ9kLmxedDEpsl2ehVCN7xOce/OJyXCYLpEEUtQ5aOYw2U9lsND0tRLizt5aN+ rp6RV1vQq1qguklhvVEy3NEMiJwK7/Usn+DE/Uz8ovrKmofKMFStZ4sDYk/Yvoe+a2k6 2Gwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlIoutcXILEPdNx9KYKiArfQTkT9efBg1T1Aav3PIFTpSyl6OWoLDxqAW3gPcUAq4/quJynoi5ha90cXdCxrQTRu+KBWVSwzz3Dni1BLfhsklsBuWA5cCyjc4Hre6MSLBQ2sfXEFMXQhoiaeIm58RHCb0Wuj5SVD2RtB9O0z2e3L2D8zKKsFwppWxF9NdUTdft0PQN1
X-Received: by 10.50.22.101 with SMTP id c5mr7812228igf.17.1382953388644; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.86.106 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <526E2E0C.904@massar.ch>
References: <20131021224346.32495.64932.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <526AACA5.7090604@si6networks.com> <E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|9f43bef2fe7433173858819bd0eeee2dp9OKUJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|E0F0D3DE-D31B-4CC2-9384-DFEBCCB8F557@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <526AC8AF.4060608@si6networks.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA7B978@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr0q2dY041CMarFfTZZx6=qHC-eJ+74qgiHP-dt7+ga7yg@mail.gmail.com> <526CDC59.4070204@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr0_anudWNpWRkvMGvD_pvyEscnuqEsPUy4YNm3e9Hue9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPv4CP9k_J2GCOFhTCBz3U-nQmCWSjc4nceexaWwYZ-nDMpJmw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKFn1SG1PC_kA-pO5Or8VyeaOzvLfpmQe0LiiYkXU_HzNqGzCQ@mail.gmail.com> <526E250E.5050607@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr1evbMf1pD4yBrZyvF2XLXGOre3bHDB0gOZTLme7vnh2A@mail.gmail.com> <526E267E.2070705@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr1K+4H+Gq9dWK-tVJu_3_pw+q7Q1owGz69eg6jy--XN5A@mail.gmail.com> <526E2A56.7070503@massar.ch> <CAKD1Yr3quaLS8zmDuf301MHL_y+uLQg0UfAEU+Kk-hwfv0oqtw@mail.gmail.com> <526E2E0C.904@massar.ch>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:42:47 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1eSy_DtOmhcH1pYtKeLZi6cHYeDu9MQP8avSZqpHka1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why /64
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b10c9cb78dcf804e9c9edb9"
Cc: "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:44:02 -0000

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch> wrote:

> See my other messages: IPv6 Privacy addresses are a myth, they do not
>  work. You can track people even when you just see IP addresses and
> ignore the upper layers. The upper layers just make it easier.
>

If you want to discuss this further, please take it to a separate thread.