IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com> Tue, 27 March 2012 08:34 UTC

Return-Path: <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC1921F88DA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.292, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5dv0C1KSeFo for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com [198.24.6.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8181E21F88D9 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2R8Yj2S028291 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 03:34:45 -0500
Received: from EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.170]) by eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) with mapi; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:34:44 -0400
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:34:42 -0400
Subject: RE: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Thread-Topic: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Thread-Index: Ac0L6/qu7UcGfdbCSQ6t3Mduua528wAB575w
Message-ID: <16D60F43CA0B724F8052D7E9323565D72AB0B33D6D@EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se>
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:34:47 -0000

Option A (with ability to configure privacy as preferred).

-Samita 

-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:34 AM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: 3484bis and privacy addresses

All,
      The chairs would like to get a sense of the working group on changing the current (defined 3484) model of preferring public addresses over privacy addresses during the address selection process.  RFC 3484 prefers public addresses with the ability (MAY) of an implementation to reverse the preference.  The suggestion has been made to reverse that preference in 3484bis (prefer privacy addresses over public ones). 
Regardless, the document will allow implementers/users to reverse the default preference.

      Please state your preference for one of the following default options :

A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses

B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses

Regards,
Brian, Bob, & Ole
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status