Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Hi,

I prefer B for reasons of avoiding privacy issues arising from using
HW-based identifiers.

Best regards,

Teemu

27. maaliskuuta 2012 9.33 Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>kirjoitti:

> All,
>     The chairs would like to get a sense of the working group on changing
> the current (defined 3484) model of preferring public addresses over
> privacy addresses during the address selection process.  RFC 3484 prefers
> public addresses with the ability (MAY) of an implementation to reverse the
> preference.  The suggestion has been made to reverse that preference in
> 3484bis (prefer privacy addresses over public ones). Regardless, the
> document will allow implementers/users to reverse the default preference.
>
>     Please state your preference for one of the following default options :
>
> A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses
>
> B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses
>
> Regards,
> Brian, Bob, & Ole
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/ipv6<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------
>