IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 25 June 2013 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01C821F9ED0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WH53shdmUaI5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ea0-x233.google.com (mail-ea0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9B021F8887 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b15so6639200eae.24 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=8TFpQvr5OjBz3L3NnhoBk1YawiLy3zuzx2xbcTx3FII=; b=FMcMBi5CTDNjmNq0Kzi71SHXOFDZf2sYMHoLD5IxQhC44cIWr3VJcAfCKI8qAtF/1C ex3LsrqC+jKfRaotARR/1zx8aaNlj5+dkPrLZat9x+k3OfgKKP1V8Az3MYf1SVmO2OY3 IRNoXh6JzzOQSuA+9gs+kJ6irCYzghl6fN8BKZJfFp+MRZRP5IcyzsRadvMApoMSk7SI u3mRcu3i+lhRM5ArZYhuGcszNH1SxR+KPDtKdPS1Z6CHdCqBvp3kUe+BVxgcYY+qpSXD hxdZLj8MKpRv10mxkE2pYXslDXUDtFVSgN2ZqWLhWRFPeMQmswByzoCDNXYfLHD5bYsK ulJA==
X-Received: by 10.14.3.73 with SMTP id 49mr28544075eeg.72.1372149507909; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.24.251.79] (dyn32-131.checkpoint.com. [194.29.32.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l42sm34200135eeo.14.2013.06.25.01.38.24 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <EE995320-48D6-4D97-888A-0C2AD5024743@apnic.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:38:23 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ABCE0528-9694-4A88-9A0C-F681B62227C8@gmail.com>
References: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85151@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C56E60.5040009@fud.no> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B9237F3@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <CAKr6gn17O+B78HJofr-z7Nsgv-y8+w4hgKy+YPicgNS126qwXA@mail.gmail.com> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F870FC@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAKr6gn2zu2n-pJMirG-seN5WX=Evyquu9EqqLOV-zf-RKQ9eYg@mail.gmail.com> <20130625015317.6B256363BD8F@drugs.dv.isc.org> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F878B0@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <EE995320-48D6-4D97-888A-0C2AD5024743@apnic.net>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org 6man-wg" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:38:33 -0000

Geoff,

> If you want to deprecate IPv6 fragmentation and still allow this form of parallel session behaviour to work rather than wedge, then the internal handling of ICMPv6 PTB messages in the host needs to be reworked as far as I can tell.
> 

I think it would be good to fix this even if we don't deprecate IPv6 fragmentation.

Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email