Re: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-11.txt> - hybrid addresses

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 23 May 2016 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9FF12B04C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 02:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8az5yqakTmBl for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 02:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C7512B009 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 02:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id u4N9DLW3021204 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 11:13:21 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F8EC2044D3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 11:13:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2852037EF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 11:13:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id u4N9DKUu007211 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 11:13:20 +0200
Subject: Re: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-11.txt> - hybrid addresses
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <20160428004904.25189.43047.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <89CA2C18-AE61-4D40-8997-221201835944@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqdZ_D7jsDdWQ2FJpLH9cXveYfcye0W2J_mSi-7bYBrOKA@mail.gmail.com> <B849F263-9F99-48E8-B903-8FE7D2CDF277@cooperw.in> <CAJE_bqd1AWOuwvQcGzHg+dAWoump29g14HEA1BoVErXDXSMxaw@mail.gmail.com> <573BCFD0.8090801@si6networks.com> <CAJE_bqfKUbO7C6LnxOOUCVBU9e679_=159Yu6Ti0zhOGDuw98Q@mail.gmail.com> <A1111BEA-C14C-4574-9214-3D9B5500FEA1@cooperw.in> <CAKD1Yr23S4yHM=31VXTJq7t11P3__GEbbRhM0c085gBjQEGi-Q@mail.gmail.com> <19ae94cd-849f-0622-54bc-42cbad51368a@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1YN6SnUNp0HKqTNg6G0egkLveCOTG_7pHo9Zq3OFP4=g@mail.gmail.com> <a65c2157-044e-6207-314e-833313e5d458@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0e3NuLCFK2N35FymoQmx4UUH-83rkQxtUB1RJbwNzY9A@mail.gmail.com> <E13EFAE7-2191-4B19-957D-B7DBA78B6C78@employees.org> <CAJE_bqczeopdc2qRU2aiY9-+6zS3oKzhJVPWQyQHJ-k46Nr5KQ@mail.gmail.com> <574210D2.9030903@si6networks.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <fbfac489-f56a-0ece-d1c6-b17cdc6846d8@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 11:13:20 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <574210D2.9030903@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/2wO1C-1v7eCCHIR5gxyjEGme7lU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:13:24 -0000


Le 22/05/2016 à 22:04, Fernando Gont a écrit :
[...]

> I'm fine with layer-2 adddr randomization. Could even consider myself
> and advocator of that (in a number of scenarios). HOwever, I'm
> against reusing numeric IDs in different places, for the reasons
> stated above.
>
> Thughts?

Do you think of other reasons than privacy for not including numeric
IDs in different places (e.g. use L2 address in L3 address)?

(privacy may be a valid reason; but hybrid addresses mixing IDs from
different layers is common elsewhere, wonder why opposing)

Alex

>
> Thanks,
>