IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios

sthaug@nethelp.no Wed, 20 February 2019 12:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917F512DDA3; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 04:02:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EBGgKqaWHtMU; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 04:02:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [IPv6:2001:8c0:9e04:500::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4239A129284; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 04:02:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (bizet.nethelp.no [IPv6:2001:8c0:9e04:500::1]) by bizet.nethelp.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02109E6079; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:02:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:02:45 +0100
Message-Id: <20190220.130245.526931615.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: gert@space.net
Cc: jordi.palet@consulintel.es, fgont@si6networks.com, v6ops@ietf.org, 6man@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <20190220113603.GK71606@Space.Net>
References: <6D78F4B2-A30D-4562-AC21-E4D3DE019D90@consulintel.es> <20190220113603.GK71606@Space.Net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 26 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/2xC6-4nZpwov8dEHtAqzM97JGRU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:02:52 -0000

>> What a sacrilege!
> 
> There's so much wrong with current IPv6 standards and implementations
> and processes that "just go with NPT" would save a lot of pain.

Would you be interesting in making a list of what you think is wrong?
(I'm not disagreeing, I'm just curious...)

Steinar Haug, AS2116

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email