IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Next steps on Extension Header Insertion

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Tue, 01 November 2016 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C3512975C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 11:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BxqewWL3cgud for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 11:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 765BE129721 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 11:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id o68so209826812qkf.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 11:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=plU90bbvJS/FXnrqs6YXK3ISpZvx0GQNvtC4nGUyv6U=; b=R0DLismM6ZMjEz6R8vq6cUqqMM9suHfwS1aQr4rpksQit9NARvNwNGYgz3xrFZ+D6T z578wm/AWHjbQcGom1nB/GXXEn3MWlvPdHlrbjdPbd1sqR+ZSqzL2+pnOUxyLPGhRhxI BvAK9QiMT0488GjPT/fzSquSpGnxtwkaPIF/A0zoYFrhIMMkwEKx1YefagRsiiA62ldQ 5k7fEO2ioXzyGL14m6rbaVEOThmC9CE7Sc7rOyN1l0+vZGSeaVPH4T1PZ41CKSP+po0l r4Ve19mdNMs5KaRo+pHmSP40cg7Nw9CW17RnR/tx+cMvS4e6CO3zT240n4qaKokamIht KFfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=plU90bbvJS/FXnrqs6YXK3ISpZvx0GQNvtC4nGUyv6U=; b=bCSrkd8FmDOfYTG7DpU/rpr6I4QK7467oQgFHfLGxVrta5svhYvOY4TPuLoS6GF+lo XMSUcPTkI9xZ6rmrejObI5gWTFAZrPRK0rvzvb/HaRzQ7VLUhT5j5yNJd3ze4E9bRSEx /4wKfBHj9AYBTUEERJQ16kQCFj83DLZpUz9qZqNIfWhxFrXt1/ziOjgS9cqf9fZPMIFI bbj9D7QW701nj3c2i4jzLUgjQb+tOf29Jis0m9MgrO79+YciQjUIzdlgZ8uJhPUYgAly ofxyLFhc8kQ1Er6r0xeZpoDWm+rRlxNz/heAc7AkU7z8Zp5eP9fxBtbNL7sPJDyEiDiJ mXCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcUO9Z8hKpB9A7udXqxj6fhOGEq4kGKYNZimBZzSN3SbID4o2zQjfCjeVm/wVWm5ZYNq21hKqWNsU4bkw==
X-Received: by 10.55.74.21 with SMTP id x21mr13794258qka.46.1478024174671; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 11:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.237.54.134 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 11:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <dfe00826-1bcd-80ae-e6dc-7763c506cbe4@si6networks.com>
References: <B291E9E6-A803-423F-BFA5-87A74DCFB784@gmail.com> <dfe00826-1bcd-80ae-e6dc-7763c506cbe4@si6networks.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 11:16:13 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Vcwffp8ENGr2zLiKnXGPUgp6SuY
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqcXBqxXk6tw4LJ==8nM7KQZ+hUX6B17HOtUn9hCv1CtAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Next steps on Extension Header Insertion
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/36veEqcUjZlGJpxpY0aYzjRhNnk>
Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 18:16:17 -0000

At Mon, 31 Oct 2016 21:54:47 -0300,
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:

> To make my point clear: I'm rather agnostic about SR, but I'm against
> ambiguity in a std track documents, particularly when behind such
> ambiguity there's the potential for a lot of problems.

+1.  This is exactly why I had a big concern even with the choice
closest to my preference.  But I understood the chairs tried to
somehow move forward by this poll given the very diversified opinions
on this issue.  So I submitted my preferences with the reservation of
the concern.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email