Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 13 May 2020 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914EA3A07D0; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tCPql7o0ic4Q; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE753A07CE; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.121.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 04DNUpXM011236 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 May 2020 16:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1589412663; x=1589499063; i=@elandsys.com; bh=SH9orKvg1rkp7tBuGE4Zd/sQONXbYPzyLbII81wkWYk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=HOANNRqSoQXWS2lEhmQkuph674iB5Ab4nDs/O45O3e+14xtHeAMFsx8gkpC3Q7xtu UUQCd3t8mJi/sI00E3QEmRhToSPhgnt8CSzzhDhGCIuTfaelKptRD2APPMqdeAzc6X 4o8SKg42ioYKTN/23zvPE1ZwZjpQ5yxS/hy80/pc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200513161434.10146fd0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 16:27:05 -0700
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 6man@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
Cc: 6man-chairs@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <2782613A-0D2B-4F62-AD73-EA41928F6E32@gmail.com>
References: <DM6PR05MB6348E9AD1E088792C2F10BB4AEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8CC3F837-B4D6-4570-AF2F-37041839F391@employees.org> <21E9A957-1A31-4A11-8E78-5F7E382866D4@juniper.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513133654.0f5815d8@elandnews.com> <2782613A-0D2B-4F62-AD73-EA41928F6E32@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/3C0euV-ujJh0vSaQL38CKdumuz4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 23:31:07 -0000

Hi Bob,
At 04:03 PM 13-05-2020, Bob Hinden wrote:
>We were asked about this and said we didn't have an answer.  We are 
>working on this.

Ok.

>The bluesheet was published right after the meeting.  See:
>
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2020-6man-02/session/6man

Thanks for the link.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy