Re: Status of <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> in AUTH48

Enno Rey <erey@ernw.de> Sun, 12 February 2017 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <erey@ernw.de>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F14A129470 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 00:48:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E0qQLM3KsLzx for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 00:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.ernw.net (mx1.ernw.net [62.159.96.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 193A81293E8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 00:47:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.ernw.net (unknown [IPv6:fd00:2001:0:d001::30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail1.ernw.net", Issuer "ernw ca1" (verified OK)) by mx1.ernw.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7168627329 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:47:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ws26.ernw.net (unknown [172.31.1.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ws26.ernw.net", Issuer "ernw ca1" (verified OK)) by mail1.ernw.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36F7B491DF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:47:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: by ws26.ernw.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 1BFA039F8E; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:47:55 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:47:55 +0100
From: Enno Rey <erey@ernw.de>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Status of <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> in AUTH48
Message-ID: <20170212084755.GC9486@ernw.de>
References: <C9FDAEB9-9F79-4186-9C48-5F44E5E07235@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C9FDAEB9-9F79-4186-9C48-5F44E5E07235@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/3FyBWlHpLWzi_PkKLclbLhvWkH4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 08:48:00 -0000

Hi,

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 09:28:40AM -0800, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16.txt> is currently in AUTH48.  According to the datatracker it has been in the RFC Editor queue for 54 days.  Everything is done, except there is an impasse over a change to the Acknowledgement Section.  One of the authors has proposed adding:
> 
>    Fernando Gont would like to thank Nelida Garcia and Guillermo Daniel
>    Gont for their love and support, and Jorge Oscar Gont and Diego
>    Armando Maradona for their inspiration.
> 
> Some of the other authors don???t think this change is appropriate for AUTH48, but the author proposing this has insisted on adding this text.
> 
> Please respond with either support or non-support for this proposed change by 18 February 2017.  I think it is unfortunate to add extra delay over this change, but after consulting with our AD, I think the best course is to ask the working group.

"The ITU works in a formal, diplomatic style, suitable for international infrastructure and government representatives. The IETF works in an informal, casual style, suitable for innovation and creativity."
(Brian Carpenter: Network Geeks, p. 137).

I think in that spirit we should be conservative when striving for technical strictness but liberal when writing April 1st RFCs, doing Scotch BoFs and tolerating unsual acknowledgement sections...

I support it.

thanks

Enno





> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bob (Document Shepard)
> 



> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Enno Rey

ERNW GmbH - Carl-Bosch-Str. 4 - 69115 Heidelberg - www.ernw.de
Tel. +49 6221 480390 - Fax 6221 419008 - Cell +49 173 6745902 

Handelsregister Mannheim: HRB 337135
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Enno Rey

=======================================================
Blog: www.insinuator.net || Conference: www.troopers.de
Twitter: @Enno_Insinuator
=======================================================