Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Thu, 30 March 2017 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD3F1296CF; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xjJ1IpA8KSDv; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usplmg20.ericsson.net (usplmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3CB512996E; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-d73ff700000009d8-65-58dd3a3b4622
Received: from EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.75]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 87.32.02520.B3A3DD85; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:02:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:47:28 -0400
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
CC: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Leddy, John" <John_Leddy@comcast.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
Thread-Topic: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
Thread-Index: AQHSnTZv86cghjjmGk6P6rsvHH5Q4qGssVmAgAD+BwCAAAesgIAAIVmAgAAFgwCAAASPgA==
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:47:22 +0000
Message-ID: <A0F19A98-7DBE-4616-B949-529ED2A81D62@ericsson.com>
References: <599257D7-532D-4512-929B-D124623EAF35@ericsson.com> <6B662F87-B0E6-4613-B406-8A22CA95DFA5@cisco.com> <4917F161-2EC8-43E0-AF4C-BFAEE44A492C@cable.comcast.com> <198e3116-5448-2fdf-4da7-4811a0133f05@gmail.com> <50E4A84C-F0ED-45ED-AA89-5713CBD8F9E0@gmail.com> <5aebc8ed-f873-94e9-1ae4-dab7b3a8ebef@gmail.com> <CA+b+ERk8kHWyBY3GPp21-pgrL_SsShaLkrn4UdecFeQPYamSEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERk8kHWyBY3GPp21-pgrL_SsShaLkrn4UdecFeQPYamSEg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.11]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0B3335B8-A35C-497C-A6BC-E72F064D784D"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrMIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXSPt66d1d0Ig+WHpC3aLu5jsnj19hqb xbON81ksXp59D+R2/GSyWLpgOZNF08ImZgd2j+udLcweO2fdZfdYsuQnk8fujQuYAliiuGxS UnMyy1KL9O0SuDK6r65lLlhhXLH/0gfGBsanBl2MnBwSAiYS9x4tZOpi5OIQEtjAKPHg020W CGc5o8THD23sIFVsQFUbdn5mArFFBFQlOk88YgYpYhaYzSSx+vQDNpCEsICHxKRN11ggijwl 1m08DGWHSZx4+owVxGYBaj637jeQzcHBK2AvseSYKMSyXmaJVQ9Pg83hFAiUWN+3kRHEZhQQ k/h+ag3YYmYBcYlbT+YzQZwtIvHwIkS9hICoxMvH/1ghbCWJj7/ns0PUT2GUaHnrCmLzCghK nJz5hGUCo8gsJKNmISmbhaQMIq4tsWzha+ZZQKcyC+hITF7ICBE2lXh99COUbS0x49dBNghb UWJK90P2BYwcqxg5SosLcnLTjQw2MQKj85gEm+4OxvvTPQ8xCnAwKvHwPth7O0KINbGsuDL3 EKMKUOujDasvMEqx5OXnpSqJ8Fqo3Y0Q4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkzjvh/IUIIYH0 xJLU7NTUgtQimCwTB6dUA2OwloWH55wlXy+/CnSYYHzzztaMKdZ3Xt2ZHvnqxPqS5YEa7y90 i0suTY7f8mLeZJadUb8XvtyWZ5buMufT9Ic+au+lTt9O+rnpq6uBYHljbdSrOTfersh7XLf7 UK+Kn9B73vlH0n+/qVDIqf3uNT13igZX1cRNItPK3ipFHvpTt7/fcPs3+2ltSizFGYmGWsxF xYkAKHy0DdYCAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/3Hwmi0R5MREF34BxSF4Zw3-_80s>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:47:39 -0000

Hi Robert,

> On Mar 30, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
> Could you elaborate a bit on the definition of "accidentally escaping packets" ?
> 
> The fundamental issue with original Suresh suggestion I see is that his proposed text kills ability to have 2460bis as normative reference in any other draft describing or defining extension headers. And effectively stops any work which needs to be based on 2460bis till 2460bis is updated.

This is not true. The *new draft* will update RFC2460bis. We do not need a new (RFC2460bis)bis to do this. I can understand that this would be bad, but that is not the intent.

Thanks
Suresh