Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Mon, 09 July 2012 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A0A11E80C8 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.097, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F7NmU5kYBRKc for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EC411E8140 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so11332316ggn.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XYvPtWdQjLvpRRc4kC7YDBDBaR0hRla4YyfbQzqw17o=; b=urvlKCjg2U5lmZu4N6LFNuHWR9KqdsIZj/ZloKbAYFevZ7FnLTZgz12l1D8U9EbvF5 f1KgBA84CiankOj2h3T0Ox6LC0duOF7fYutLGLrkZrCc2u8zJNINCn3SGZy01wIoGKcL T7U14s0zAJP6Pmu80aMMWrTIifrqEhxKOuZ7ketK7kmes9HzTthSE0k4bLjhe25pia53 i3XOXG2ymWm6jEAMUoKHwKL3LPeJTRkx4NcvubN79V9EsL8ni/7sYe4KnC9LZmHDHafT eex2dtLdNCJmHtBab/sFCuzNwy+ZNI9M2bmvaQu+0dci2yt9ZMRcunxl0/0PQzwCoJcj IqUQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.130.68 with SMTP id u4mr20941268ics.17.1341854292337; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.118.210 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <23986.1341586765@marajade.sandelman.ca>
References: <4FF696AA.3050508@tut.fi> <23986.1341586765@marajade.sandelman.ca>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:18:12 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcfCw=ECvTGFGMabScFA+CQkw4_wTAfYg=5r=UQ4PBKcHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:17:52 -0000

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Michael Richardson
<mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
>>>>>> "Aleksi" == Aleksi Suhonen <Aleksi.Suhonen@tut.fi> writes:
>     Aleksi> Within an hour, all the IPv4 addresses in the pool for our
>     Aleksi> NAT64 were registered to this one device.
>
> Do I understand that you attempt to provide a single IPv4 address 1:1
> with a an internal IPv6 address? (NAT vs NAPT)

It seems like this is what is called stateless NAT64.
I am not sure if there is any document specifying stateless NAT64?

Regards,

Behcet