IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Why one Internet?

Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> Wed, 11 April 2012 07:29 UTC

Return-Path: <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A510821F866D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XWgMos8jFa3Q for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80B521F851B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbtb4 with SMTP id tb4so985663obb.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+/U2iHXH7KxAWVVwOWGF6/IJGjR9eDzsjSHfMR/CdqQ=; b=QWeb9m5mgoIfxIW8b10T59LzpXyAns3M4iaHL88XIzP7fiXKrbh90P1SFuWZy/GbE2 ZequOuvhLWAe71Ts5wGTyxM7bCPvECcOa7EpZaDj0Ks9lbiLjSKo3eEYqUkA+t+mriRz v5ziCvnG46IGL4lsm5isaUZ6lgkAqN2de8Zy3DSBJ1XdoG8W6Ip2c4Gy2FxVr5kkXqi6 2cuvBdpsRLEW2gvbSBrl2EZz9W3gPJcnPz0so04lYtwpD+llRXx2EPUAcGthEkLsUW2o Mw1xWWUoDWmwN7Tp6jaAgMPnDotnqfsjf48rheqH8DvrdnxSekkLTtZs0EpHxc4Ttxh5 rhkA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.114.70 with SMTP id je6mr20402619obb.30.1334129342182; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.44.104 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B0147C3DD45E42478038FC347CCB65FE02BB7026F4@XCH-MW-08V.mw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <CACQuieahKvE3VRPXcCirc4zhHokpkQVsMUDdcrjkZdNoSKpidg@mail.gmail.com> <4F8481B1.2000101@gmail.com> <B0147C3DD45E42478038FC347CCB65FE02BB7026F4@XCH-MW-08V.mw.nos.boeing.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:29:02 +0300
Message-ID: <CACQuieZxAxTH9UdbwPjZojOuRkhP7aY5KjuXS-=z4HxmgsTeHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why one Internet?
From: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
To: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0444746b86745904bd623118"
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:29:03 -0000

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Manfredi, Albert E <
albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com> wrote:

> Yes, that was also my reaction. Why one Internet? Because Internet means
> tying together multiple separate networks. Of course you can have the same
> addresses on the different networks. Nothing new there either. That’s why
> we have NATs, NAPTs, and IPv6 NPTs.****
>
> ** **
>
> No one is forcing an ISP or an enterprise network to use a combination of
> protocols. They can already opt to be IPv4 only, or IPv6 only, or dual
> stack, or eventually IPv7. Matter of fact, years ago, our enterprise had an
> assortment of different networks, tied together by Softswitch gateways.
> IPv4, SNA, DECnet.****
>
> **
>

I have no problem with anyone. I am facing my own illusions.

Here is my conclusion after years of work on IPv6.

IPv6 guy is just a salesman.

But the salesman thought the entire world should buy his product.

The product cannot change.

There is no other product.

Not even sure the product was really needed.

Complete delusion.

Pars



> **
>
> Bert****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:54 PM
> *To:* Pars Mutaf
> *Cc:* ipv6@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: Why one Internet?****
>
> ** **
>
> Wasn't this what the Internet was supposed to be? I'm tempted to ask how
> old you are, but I don't want to be rude.
>
> As the Monty Python would put it: 'You see, the key is in the name - Inter
> - net(work)'
>
> :-)
>
> cheers
>
> Carlos
>
> ****
>

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email