Re: Unprocessed errata for RFC4941

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FD7120A03; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 11:00:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mWR3iq0tSHru; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 11:00:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4E71209E4; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 11:00:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id v19so12987303pfm.3; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 11:00:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gTTEbawy97G1/lY6+QEjgysD3DbgZytMNo4p/6AWN/o=; b=Qzalu118+GZyylqjT4Rl4qXe94biw4gvVioK6jWXiWUTxNH3je5CNBsdX/Qw5IlZNx 72VLS8B7FITw0ZT8iKnV24sLo1bZaYyH0DGTEm58FTZfk0AgzOXOnxSsjGNT0DK+HEF+ TVGhXoxDZWyyVcx0HAWuedASYeAQgkk3ZBQgDBd8fnF6hNaVgdFzjVeeZhPKx+snURsB NMrPy1MowhiR5XVhWKEap/xaeP5ClW7tPeh+ILA/ymodxJt7J+YGEZXOQaLl8rYaNpz3 /u0BsZ8Axyn0/07g/4YPuwNL+rpeE4OyTfA7cEJ+DaSjOAtIrL2f2tGuMs+v9DCNGZNP ZKMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gTTEbawy97G1/lY6+QEjgysD3DbgZytMNo4p/6AWN/o=; b=S5UD6mzp3TUChwdiG95bIuEKAbFxIycCxOXKn976U5RIsqDPWctCz/O7uOr6TY1wCA XMRYCL7uvjIm1m+C8R/K0A/oEZ0S2UzbxJw15YQ7MvzdpFhrGR5TLox2UCvXlgCQtiZG BKPFUr2wVYpwxuCO6zIbJgKP5Sx7M+RJIQiwKI5j058oQI8p5XINiQcObC4Ki/eCixuB OQTL9lojOnRfgJvcxt5Cn+ExXgcxY55YIzIfHcgzlfkDM0BxanuD3+Hv0FmVs+FH3Cvq eNR+JilDuf0ekwMWOBJgG0/Qt3Kcyp5ev18ueq19bOMZ0UWL8ksuFhUWnW6cN6pBTZaD fYEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUPmwMJaY8Qpd3wzBu1aUzTnhV//sFR4JuseT+VdJxJ4zP8x1Yh eeOy8hdQJp+2aP/VSa9ePrpszmaA
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzSPi4vuKN9xcRPGSSSsgp0J3R3oKEdh5Xxllc1JxcRUYjcrM3F+wGwiEJdcLDcn4R3FkAMow==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:f916:: with SMTP id h22mr32461414pgi.423.1572894001097; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 11:00:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (8.166.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.166.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v23sm6742696pff.5.2019.11.04.10.59.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Nov 2019 11:00:00 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Unprocessed errata for RFC4941
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Cc: "6man-chairs@ietf.org" <6man-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <50c84bc8-49c6-81d1-63c6-d455cd8ecbc5@si6networks.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <39f3a376-64b6-82b0-9e63-00c490214ca9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:59:56 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50c84bc8-49c6-81d1-63c6-d455cd8ecbc5@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/4-ZfFz0vyoF1WpWgiL6rI_uuaPA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 19:00:09 -0000

On 04-Nov-19 21:40, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> While working on RFC4941bis, I went through the errata. Some errata are
> still in the "reported" state. This is what I suggest for them:
> 
> * Errata 4763 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4763):
> 
> Change status to "Verified"

Agreed

> * Errata 5182 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5182):
> 
> Change status to "rejected", on the basis "The issue raised goes beyond
> a fix via the errata system. This should be raised in the appropriate
> working group within the IETF." (same as
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4594).

Agreed.

   Brian