Re: I-D Action: draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free-01.txt
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 28 October 2013 12:25 UTC
Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0671621E8092 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hHGo22na6zP7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x232.google.com (mail-ie0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957D821E8093 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x13so11443539ief.9 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=kJah1za1tBwggS+dyAp4TPwerzx+UAXjmT/IiQzj1JA=; b=fvgLBtSWU6ZsKz9dTdUPHtKFrX3mTo3vUF9cH93v96qV1GHl6dL90gRvvpH+kS4J2a PLsVr7MOWVtKkyz1gwhHg1zrOdIEPNAUJqiqZs9nLSUBb70XRTYoeLvc28hGw+QEOlvU 9nSLoqaVbgY+p8/9mqlHWXhtLWf+z1ENWEgUj5T2TVyAwQwjN+CvXjax2dsDkhjQrsHw f+2bF5j3HyJ6cfqVcrmuSiy8F2KYE/uK/1In97G+nOSjX1zrUbEQdOjZQ8QR+HdCHk7P iIxk1Do96vPiL1A+/30ImWd2w4oyTC04xgC+Wsxvrtu/lKABDyFQr1QTwkGcc+MMuor1 GlpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=kJah1za1tBwggS+dyAp4TPwerzx+UAXjmT/IiQzj1JA=; b=ToJ6JbpnxNTvy08SXHAcazTM0xqvAe1UQ8lG2YXIIcUI727Lj2VL2gVEpirNscz66J bqKiQVdL5OsyxjX30Pifyx17DDfAMwv/PNguvvM0SritSOsSP1iQidc8QJH9jZMW6v9n 2Grhg4d+JTWvhqbJ3b3mbkUcyehBUzYRjgHG18ECXWwkfoZYNvbRwN3mACCRzUhw8gVG OHcFuiBcltkXXSfgtsTy/Vz21Bc8ahWduM93o1XsFBzKdZtgDslORl9ETr3IPcdU9N+/ jZLY/F4T5U1MuzkNtr4yDEPGRmErhYJcbJfdcg1VcB59MVjgSMSIJqc/f4u2Ra8BcMzU qBng==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmq1U7NZbV/9gKkjeqNjP262JnDwvlq1hpaSe5rWKxGfwnSZGYRvDkJeZ1tKJgmqrWK3VV8NPqETcQTGvraRHSS/3SBMXGsAwxEiFjmaFC2q8rd98vtqZ+ys/FhB3RuvG+ChviKSIf9jsdSygb/D3AK3EM9/tRAOc2i0YicEQtmdcYckBBvv0Bhz9afq336GSgrtlb2
X-Received: by 10.42.53.148 with SMTP id n20mr217033icg.69.1382963103067; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.86.106 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 05:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8392F9BAC6AD5F47920216A6D7853F7E1D581938@BPXM02GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
References: <8392F9BAC6AD5F47920216A6D7853F7E1D581938@BPXM02GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:24:41 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2yUTUgmbsse1h38qmGjZ0uSZaHdyehXdEJBUty8p81tg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free-01.txt
To: Hiroshi Kitamura <kitamura@da.jp.nec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf302236757f0fef04e9cc30a8"
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "Ata, Shingo (ata@info.eng.osaka-cu.ac.jp)" <ata@info.eng.osaka-cu.ac.jp>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:25:17 -0000
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Hiroshi Kitamura <kitamura@da.jp.nec.com>wrote: > For such a case (the same value addresses are located on different > attached networks at same time), it is impossible to specify the correct > destination without accompanying with "Zone-ID (interface)" > information. > > At that situation, please accompany with "Zone-ID". > So you're saying that we shouldn't use scope IDs, but if the same IPv6 address is on two links, then we must use scope IDs? How is the user supposed to know whether to use the scope ID or not?
- RE: I-D Action: draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free-0… Hiroshi Kitamura
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free-0… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free-0… Brian Jones
- RE: I-D Action: draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free-0… Hiroshi Kitamura
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free-0… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free-0… 神明達哉
- Re: I-D Action: draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free-0… Brian Haberman