Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA3B1294EC; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 23:34:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQ2emMd4Mdyt; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 23:34:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50CE4129AD3; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 23:34:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRwNH-0003Y9-OR; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 07:34:12 +0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:34:09 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Lorenzo Colitti Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06 In-Reply-To: References: <148406593094.22166.2894840062954191477.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <82245ef2-cd34-9bd6-c04e-f262e285f983@gmail.com> <18e6e13c-e605-48ff-4906-2d5531624d64@gmail.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Archived-At: Cc: IPv6 List , IETF , int-dir@ietf.org, Bob Hinden , draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis.all@ietf.org X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 07:34:20 -0000 >> we have had to fight massively with vendors to make it classless. >> please do not give them excuses to break things. > > On a lot of hardware /65 - /126 is not very well-supported. guess the business reason why. the classful spec gave them a good excuse to do a tcam rinse repeat. i pay to feed the darned chickens, it's time to break the egg. randy