Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Wed, 28 March 2012 07:04 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D414921E8150 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pcnzMSSwrnYu for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FE621E80E7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2S748P3088148; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:04:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201203280704.q2S748P3088148@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Ray Hunter <Ray.Hunter@globis.net>
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:00:07 +0200. <4F71F217.7000209@globis.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:04:08 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:04:13 -0000

 In your previous mail you wrote:

>  Also not sure if any DHCPv6 server implementations actually provide 
>  DHCPv6 assigned temporary addresses in practice.

=> I coded this for the ISC DHCP some years ago so I am sure there is
at least one.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr