Re: there _is_ IPv6 NAT - just look for it

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 16 March 2014 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC52D1A02F4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b7U0qkbeVmt0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3BC1A02ED for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb-aye.local (c-50-174-18-221.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.174.18.221]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s2GEpCxP012213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 16 Mar 2014 14:51:13 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <5325BA5B.1040807@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:51:07 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/27.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: there _is_ IPv6 NAT - just look for it
References: <E2C06D73-99FF-42B5-A3BE-337C307BCB0E@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0fjSWfPDkvc9Z53xBKxMGzYcVGzH3tLUGbjCKmgR_Duw@mail.gmail.com> <532374CD.3040100@gmail.com> <532401CB.8000003@gmail.com> <5324A1FF.3010109@gmail.com> <53255C09.7060900@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <53255C09.7060900@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5HDhVf8JNoNSVcXGgS9VdWLfl1bssvUix"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sun, 16 Mar 2014 14:51:13 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/4aFu0suQAtQlCy2VhYTtpQvL-20
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 14:51:24 -0000

On 3/16/14, 1:08 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
...
> 
> Yes, that is a shocking error in the 3GPP world, but that doesn't
> mean that the IETF should legitimise it.
> 
>     Brian

Shock implies surprise.  3gpp release 8 was frozen 7.75 years ago.
version 11 has has dhcpv6 PD.