IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN Working group last call: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 17 March 2016 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8762612DAC2 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y8A7eR1FOWQm for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22c.google.com (mail-yw0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9848D12DBE1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id g127so98767260ywf.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7mIzpsgyzuiqdn6yrs543e4KTxVodeUUNngjBUfEyvA=; b=UG23FPQPrSGzSw7gUuw1Hs9r7k4tO4NSdh4g2eI74nadTvcnXVkUW2JvN4wbTZBZ+a wZu+tqPb6byV5XJpviooD5t7IBlmXkF4DKhNO+xia0DjgPN+LDgJNuJno2bj1xT2GbXC 1+uxf52H/gW4eTumA9CBETYieuim0iHfT935G2hjEtYEMnxCTHYNwYWrqeCSjpkiV07M m9dsF76fHzu1fuqZKx19l1VdOdxAgQGzMiBRL79KnM5TdXkdmQd+RLVQuH274SS3W2I3 L4eND/z1TM+hpRxjc47av2O3ootwek6TnR43A5MEUYsM/tLWkULFYva4mrnS8JpSzBkw fZGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7mIzpsgyzuiqdn6yrs543e4KTxVodeUUNngjBUfEyvA=; b=en1k0ewkLzPyJ1Q/d204qLN+okEi3K0w5mDnHvcM64NJi/+wv4UrJxWPdDhompg6II nR2UzHzXuof0tZTcGzd996e38mlUqyjCX2DDaQ89bmfw6UfWItuF2NRTxJJtzahzMNAe iZjOgFv4A2DpyZfr3EOs2EHq7jvKrVgmj15EgOIBap+ONSngqgbEzxodVtj/UnO1ZEEp 6/fPtskgPhaVrBNcYLdFu/S2jXkterMvZCiD6uux2Dx6IMihH9Kd2qaADnG7ZllYwT40 OcPTg4JyJd7mCjiZ9CWJKMyc4CSrzr+UqHz89rAGVlF/Y4wTC+KxoDDOSMiC712ZwMei Y1UQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIYgsQUZ+VsnUtYkf04BiNv07i/7HeOeHt+f21g14sqEy4yHkLfvBpnX2W9+sKjf89EgPLDzjaG9rjerGOs
X-Received: by 10.129.2.134 with SMTP id 128mr4112458ywc.337.1458219906660; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.19.65 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPK2DeyT-K1LR3+dAuLiuS2L=xr7Q4e2N-QZAoWHRC_cQSFKzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6AC58C26-01B6-4C16-851F-0C1228CDD2AF@employees.org> <CAJE_bqfvE0jGoRi2X=ohpqsXmGx9AVKnjeGH-P8zWp6=3_kbVA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2DewJ0uF9i_uaKLCn5gM_KGm2uv5B0a2VFm7cmNNn5acQPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqcetbtgsje4TqCpUF+zoUL19RHjWj2-xg+N39i8XodDVQ@mail.gmail.com> <517ACBE4-46C3-40C7-86E5-5906309E6BA9@employees.org> <CAJE_bqfeLxURYwMDcjMtSnyb2WBeYu_5Yq_2Yyo_O9sqHRn+og@mail.gmail.com> <73EEC8CE-EDC8-45FC-AE4F-F390F965304F@employees.org> <CAPK2DezV9vKYrHCAJJ_bFQZa02MCJMPdX7=BtL-tPzOj+da6vQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqd316puXTvku3hMMGnThOV3JGMbLK_erQJDd6ic-BNJgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2DezfW5khZyW-2wNfZ04=BSV2xq57Z52WDCoeivt4J9tvig@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfLtPmFBqZXDCfnnxZHUvzQFbicV0dweS23VjL_oEbDVg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2Dew4AVuZ9ssQnwSfbGu7vfS1f__8tgNWk9WFhEep7wPdGA@mail.gmail.com> <56EA8D27.3060704@forthnet.gr> <CAPK2DeyT-K1LR3+dAuLiuS2L=xr7Q4e2N-QZAoWHRC_cQSFKzw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 22:04:46 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr142AT1UKfdQG4D9HaROJKKJN8Zj+ywj3sp9T-qNq7wNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN Working group last call: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis
To: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140c9e08b77d0052e3e47e7"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/4lKdhTLhghqrAXoqpZJDQ6I62b8>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:06:22 -0000

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <
jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> wrote:

> The DNS options from Router Advertisements and DHCP SHOULD be
> stored into the DNS Repository and Resolver Repository so that
> information from DHCP appears there first and therefore takes
> precedence. This is because IPv6 hosts usually prefer DHCP to
> RA for their network configuration. Thus, the DNS information
> from DHCP takes precedence over that from RA for DNS queries.
>

Um... "DHCP should be first because hosts prefer DHCP to be first,
therefore DHCP should be first"? That's circular reasoning.

I'm not even sure "IPv6 hosts usually prefer DHCP to RA for their network
configuration" is a true statement. Do we have data on that?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email