RE: Why one Internet?

"Greg Kavalec" <Kavalec@bswa.com> Wed, 11 April 2012 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <Kavalec@bswa.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853D611E80A5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9c1rnIofHEMM for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bswa.com (unknown [12.185.92.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D267B11E80C2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: Why one Internet?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CD17F2.97BDC556"
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:51:34 -0500
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Message-ID: <FAAD508504F9934CA62FB99A5906858C0437CD80@cordoba.bswa.local>
In-Reply-To: <CACQuieahKvE3VRPXcCirc4zhHokpkQVsMUDdcrjkZdNoSKpidg@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Why one Internet?
Thread-Index: Ac0XHOCkb1c9LfmSRD63PCFAB6YAKQA1XXSw
References: <CACQuieahKvE3VRPXcCirc4zhHokpkQVsMUDdcrjkZdNoSKpidg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Greg Kavalec" <Kavalec@bswa.com>
To: "Pars Mutaf" <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>, <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:10 -0000

Avoiding the situation you describe is exactly why "The Internet" was
commercially adopted.

 

Without One Internet, we will have commercial walled gardens; open
exchange of information will suffer.

 

 

 

From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Pars Mutaf
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:25 AM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Why one Internet?

 

Hi,

 

In my opinion, we can add one more Internet when necessary, then another
one etc. 

 

We can have as many Internets as we need, all different. 

 

We just need a *network of Internets*. 

 

The first (current) Internet is an IPv4 Internet.

The second Internet can be an IPv4 Internet too. In this case we would
have 2 IPv4 Internets. 

Obviously, in this case, we would have the same addresses used by two
different nodes in 

the two Internets. I think it is possible to locate the node we need. I
am not here to discuss 

these details. 

 

The second Internet can be an IPv6 Internet. 

 

The second Internet can be a IPv7 Internet. 

 

The second Internet can be IPv6 but we may have a third one which is
IPv7 etc. 

 

We just need a network of Internets, all possibly different. 

 

Pars

http://content-based-science.org/ <http://content-based-science.org/>