Re: A proposal for draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Fri, 03 March 2017 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D371297AC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 01:36:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umn.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2M6VM6AnGV1o for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 01:36:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (mta-p6.oit.umn.edu [134.84.196.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 924701294BD for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 01:36:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018C1BA7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 09:36:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at umn.edu
Received: from mta-p6.oit.umn.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta-p6.oit.umn.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jYsqrjsmmcMf for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 03:36:04 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail-ua0-f198.google.com (mail-ua0-f198.google.com [209.85.217.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9192B96 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 03:36:04 -0600 (CST)
Received: by mail-ua0-f198.google.com with SMTP id f54so63866287uaa.5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 01:36:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=t3oZcV7yKrFdFuC3xPhcmhVxAMwQiVI1zeFi6aobk0k=; b=DixV18f4SLx7/yHWlvQyXBXWCvWFL9hzm0HJQpWJFjArs+Rvqs25PiqDLfCVGKYtn6 dYSeL4HIbD5C9lgvwYUO2EVvMa7qs43vg0mdQh5HUKT/5TXJo0FbQ77w1CrtWhkmOWbh CVw5LsCF6jydmggA4ShYOAx+UOzQ2U3KXnWleYyplns4T8+T38T01GMU9MVT0W0mTGxj dZcZkgoRcTCzyTF+6kKKrS+Kedhub8TXuhWCrhyf8nnkcJJ/zS3uHsqx4nOOJGbC1rnG SyRJOGTXYQGeyxQ3wCRMvoGuKcl90/1O8u2+jEr6Y+w/sWabziyxsTnEhedPreE8MGi5 HSnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t3oZcV7yKrFdFuC3xPhcmhVxAMwQiVI1zeFi6aobk0k=; b=qnkw33nATeJfQpYv/ltKnLwGMqxnNCe+uU2jefIgVqhBI7AeLNYXwoZr3+rNh2qWV5 8Zvfg/c7ZzfR17rjt3PY1HFhIioNiJVIlc9nn/AtKzQGfKINCc2KeqxnOxtrT8X+H+YC DebJ3YccGxCRIXBhBh7OqmUzaK7xr6QSW/d/aiO1k9tbNl0t2QzEOWRgPONL4e2PnYLX /rXvnQpUQUnpoFJYSmsXTEV9JDQwIXkOMdbXzY+CZ11FH9jbdVfZFAsYxEMFgrpMIa1M u9HcZOuzphJJZ6RSH6QPba/7KeinnQLL3wJHMof8+fTzHVDRU+DSlRwvbfrnmMq6k/cH 9XyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n6Tt6s1VucKQ4pNZcVcXIhD8G8efUs1lPoGJ9kwRvVIrSw+kNJLrQb+RinTxyn3XYnTIDo6mqT8vaob+1OhpNptAjaW+us4LvqkVZJr9hgZA8hbYUpKSkGAL7bSP3nX+uZaXuMxBwVhPM=
X-Received: by 10.176.3.81 with SMTP id 75mr513627uat.163.1488533764059; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 01:36:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.176.3.81 with SMTP id 75mr513625uat.163.1488533763885; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 01:36:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.89.71 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 01:36:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <96a5dfe9-0122-0f8c-5ad3-f98dc1867f25@gmail.com>
References: <CAN-Dau17q_BrUuzfvB1mLDt6p5UxYikphWaHpa8VQ2L-3kx-DA@mail.gmail.com> <96a5dfe9-0122-0f8c-5ad3-f98dc1867f25@gmail.com>
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 03:36:03 -0600
Message-ID: <CAN-Dau3rKf1vqb3Fb7emJ75iJ+nTC-Vu=Ude--A0bDV-P8Bcpg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A proposal for draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135208a3ba3ce0549d04633
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/4qAAMrK6wqCMtUyxMhAKII8lKF0>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 09:36:06 -0000

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>; wrote:

>
> Le 02/03/2017 à 23:43, David Farmer a écrit :
>
>>
>> 2. Subnet Prefixes of 64 bits are RECOMMENDED
>>
>
> I disagree, we dont want to say this.
>

Why, please


> 3. IIDs are REQUIRED to be 64 bits
>>
>
> I disagree.
>

Again why, and would be ok to RECOMMEND at least

It seems wrong to completely remove any reference to 64 in the IPv6
Addressing Architecture, come on.

-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================