IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 13 May 2020 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0463A091C; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qMgp2nKlu8Wv; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE753A091D; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.121.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 04DKqYod000221 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 May 2020 13:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1589403165; x=1589489565; i=@elandsys.com; bh=NRJzh6eKKtW7NMFM9vmOEWJwmUaTaW5v6Eqf+pGNTqc=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=zmN7WBCU73td+t+iD8PgyTTiJe1DWhEMWKta/sfQKP0oF5/3HUAvjWNqlqU51tMB5 GBpeg3sdU4BRZglMX7/Jiq14gunCSaKzBmF1FafWYAXSQiD5hk+E4HglvCMAq2AUAk jAeHf0nscaQrMPAeMjEB+0PIZwblMmNNeOY+5yGI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200513133654.0f5815d8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 13:52:20 -0700
To: 6man-chairs@ietf.org, 6man@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Adoption call criteria for CRH? [was: Re: CRH and RH0]
In-Reply-To: <21E9A957-1A31-4A11-8E78-5F7E382866D4@juniper.net>
References: <DM6PR05MB6348E9AD1E088792C2F10BB4AEBF0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8CC3F837-B4D6-4570-AF2F-37041839F391@employees.org> <21E9A957-1A31-4A11-8E78-5F7E382866D4@juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/4y0gfqx0k6txL0OE8H-ORi1JniE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 20:52:48 -0000

Dear 6MAN Working Chairs,

During the last 6MAN, there was a comment about the Working Chair 
about it being too early to have an adoption call for 
draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr.  Could the Working Chairs please 
provide some information about their decision as there isn't any 
information about that in the minutes?

I could not find the attendance list for the working group meeting 
which was held on May 5.  Isn't it an IETF requirement to publish 
that information?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email