Re: Why has RFC 4941 been designed in such a way, that it might cause address conflicts?

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Wed, 16 March 2011 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E8C3A69B5 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.227
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id raFTc3yVCn32 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [91.121.26.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A91D3A6957 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2GFFeFD082005; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:15:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201103161515.p2GFFeFD082005@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Markus Hanauska <hanauska@equinux.de>
Subject: Re: Why has RFC 4941 been designed in such a way, that it might cause address conflicts?
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:37:35 +0100. <6E78895C-8CFC-4B4B-9882-B20C29D25E01@equinux.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:15:40 +0100
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:14:15 -0000

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   The chances that a MD5 hash of any data will ever be exactly zero
   (all octets are zero) is ridiculous tiny.

=> yes, I offer a free beer to you if you find one for the next
IETF meeting.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr