Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 26 February 2020 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D1B3A1237 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:16:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LMi7WRjQqCYW for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 154003A1235 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id f3so617906qkh.3 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:16:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K9JpOieJd2wVgQbueic+KuEgudJqktELSVEIgIrBcHs=; b=eygD+QKRu7Oby7SAKGQWkG28JwqgWaenChBQKBOuqg8ZmOUlcb6i6iAhML1/BKpR89 laq1mfFhZHJ4WaV6IIPVL+Kofmlb5zyLon4oZVo8EI+BXtO1F/T/fZd6DwO6hoTAoR/h 4AhQZNedLq0XvZq9LmwUV4Gd9ExiPj0PQSqYx2/T80pI+CdoHDnbvTL8eUQ81fo02KzC 27t5OMJmvhbnxrCUzt29ufPDOWeGfK0ftKyx/YMxzq1+9BD1Ni3+kUXuhER+7uTNxDwl PDOgkAuOVccdk+JcS2EIrsRXpkou6AJxUqjyR7odlLSEeyxAuZQwXFjWhogRB6rOiZdR JW9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K9JpOieJd2wVgQbueic+KuEgudJqktELSVEIgIrBcHs=; b=qR8UMgjWJJkCezM3K5F3Bp95B4tqU0cxXbcopjVAwvTq9EGj6aa+4iCPxGetjQwJSH htXr6ZsH57lczpRPDY+18KsTtgd9Zm88zLbcDuPRSX6O58EoI/oZhh/yOivLz4ExwZ8V /m4BToOJ3zn5j7ib5kPQt3BkEY34wtdQ3ThTl+p17HkAXQ6XWZKS7TPGRmBxMTLPFvUr +Uc5nbdNKAaM+UxwWyEuh720LgZsiV5yKY+bKOJLuxnN36wTsYvM9zk30+PN3QxY6KHB zb/Z9X6SwOzi8a8OiGOgV9S8vyfDJw4PaU+fbjbuoGO5n/eFaVVZujPvjm2SDltJYMfR jdgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUKMCRZTB3moZDDFwSHytg62NVqe/msVMgNPFo2Wm6TY6T2mGG 1Sa4CnxV5H1rm+xcGVPMalc6kRoVliUMQERtzBiP0Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyyTRmWxjZsOKKOgUqdVj6p5TZiyprfKTeTtD4Hc0wRcESdg8j20yZ4TMgxU7kYxDR2ELJOpuMD5lonmPNCboY=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9047:: with SMTP id s68mr693184qkd.63.1582744566595; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:16:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <F88E3F76-DD4B-4807-A458-85FABFF20D96@gmail.com> <5D218BFB-0D6F-4F7D-858F-B571A67DC47F@leddy.net>
In-Reply-To: <5D218BFB-0D6F-4F7D-858F-B571A67DC47F@leddy.net>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:15:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJ_ipEvU0NUx44XbK0_DrLe_GRw6G=m+chK4wZcRP8BMg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
To: John Leddy <john@leddy.net>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/59tKb-c5jYtsGA3ViFb1EQNf_CQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:16:13 -0000

I would suggest that people read RFC 7282 - "On Consensus and Humming
in the IETF", especially Sections 3 & 6 (it is a short document, you
should read the whole thing, but pay special attention to these
sections).

It doesn't really matter how many people say +1 for moving it forwards
-- if there are valid technical objections these have to be dealt with
- and I think that the relationship with RFC8200 falling into this
category...

W

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 2:01 PM John Leddy <john@leddy.net> wrote:
>
> +1 in support of moving the document forward.
>
> John Leddy
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:22 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Zafar,
> >
> >> On Feb 26, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Zafar Ali (zali) <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1,
> >>
> >> Just to add, in the spirit of IETF https://www.ietf.org/how/runningcode/ …
> >> implementation, commercial deployment and Inter-op status has been documented in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status/
> >
> > I think the proper question is there a consensus to advance this document.
> >
> > There seems to be questions about its relationship with RFC8200.  I am not seeing this as being resolved.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > ipv6@ietf.org
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf