IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Options for draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 08 May 2012 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4230621F84DA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 07:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.203, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jHQMYO+2kqQW for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 07:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB3221F84D6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2012 07:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q48EfkHd009160; Tue, 8 May 2012 16:41:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (reingewinn.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE8C9E61; Tue, 8 May 2012 16:41:45 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Options for draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FA92EA3.1040802@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 16:41:44 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EF98272B-2380-434E-8A33-BD1D74F22FB0@tzi.org>
References: <4F9CF3A8.7000801@gmail.com> <4FA92EA3.1040802@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 14:41:56 -0000

On May 8, 2012, at 16:33, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

>   http://[fe80::a-en1]

Of the proposals that require changing RFC 3986, this is clearly the best one.

(My personal favorite is still hijacking IPvFuture, as in http://[v6.fe80::a-en1], but I can understand when people don't like that.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email