Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-farmer-6man-routing-64-02.txt

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Tue, 08 January 2019 09:04 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <154681065615.17040.11409819739117044092.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <154681065615.17040.11409819739117044092.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 03:03:40 -0600
Message-ID: <CAN-Dau2mAKLjun0UEjFbnGr0tCFk1oyh2EhDrHAfarRwQD=Ckw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-farmer-6man-routing-64-02.txt
To: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001a15f6057eeea0ca"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/5wJ4vZHDf0DDRiPeC-gRQNOE97g>
Precedence: list

The following are the changes in this version;

   *Fixed typos, formatting and other editorial changes
   *Further refined the argument for standard form of interface identifiers.
   *Added quote of RFC4291, Section 2.5, paragraph 1 in Section 2.2, CIDR,
etc...
   *Further developed the conclusion, providing an argument why
a requirement is the incorrect relationship.

Please take a look and provide any comments

Thanks

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 3:37 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-farmer-6man-routing-64-02.txt
To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>

A new version of I-D, draft-farmer-6man-routing-64-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by David Farmer and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-farmer-6man-routing-64
Revision:       02
Title:          IPv6 Routing and its Relationship to the 64-bit Boundary in
the IPv6 Addressing Architecture
Document date:  2019-01-06
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          16
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farmer-6man-routing-64-02.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farmer-6man-routing-64/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farmer-6man-routing-64-02
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-farmer-6man-routing-64
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-farmer-6man-routing-64-02

Abstract:
   There is a common misconception that the IPv6 Addressing Architecture
   requires the use of only /64 subnet prefixes for subnet routing.
   This document clarifies the characterization of the relationship
   between IPv6 routing and the 64 bit boundary, which is that of a
   recommendation for the use of /64 subnet prefixes for subnet routing
   in most circumstances, not a requirement for such.  To further
   clarify this relationship, the document also provides operational
   guidance for the configuration of subnet prefixes and updates
   RFC 4291 accordingly.

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-farmer-6m… David Farmer
Re: New Version Notification for draft-farmer-6ma… 神明達哉
Re: New Version Notification for draft-farmer-6ma… David Farmer