[IPv6]Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing-17: (with COMMENT)

Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 29 May 2024 14:43 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <171699383235.64031.6723243938023864770@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 07:43:52 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: NQLMRU2EIHLCYQYOB3KL2OXKY3JQWYRK
CC: draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org
Reply-To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: [IPv6]Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing-17: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/6ou60U-1Cdrn3lFg5wWxm6Z7nak>

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks for Brian Trammell for the
TSVART review.

I have no issues here from transport protocol point of view, however, I am
supporting Roman's discuss as I would also like to know what is classified as
reasonable exception.

[IPv6]Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft… Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker