FW: [pim] Comment on draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu?

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Mon, 09 April 2012 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B5C21F8767 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0DCov4SoRFud for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62A321F8762 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AFB75073; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:08:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:06:41 -0700
Received: from SZXEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.160) by dfweml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:06:40 -0700
Received: from SZXEML526-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.22]) by szxeml421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.160]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:06:32 +0800
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: FW: [pim] Comment on draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu?
Thread-Topic: [pim] Comment on draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu?
Thread-Index: Ac0TbPRReFB8+MLJQ6Wly2HsnKucXQCys0+AABDgVYA=
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:06:32 +0000
Message-ID: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C95D0B4@szxeml526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.246.19]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:08:20 -0000

> For IPv6 one could perhaps use RAs?

Tina


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stig Venaas [mailto:stig@venaas.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 11:02 AM
> To: Tina TSOU
> Cc: pim@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pim] Comment on draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu?
> 
> On 4/5/2012 1:44 PM, Tina TSOU wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > May the author of draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu ask people to read the
> draft and provide comments?
> >
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu/
> >
> > Thank you in advance.
> 
> See the minutes I just posted if you like.
> 
> My main comment is that MTU is important for other protocols too, and
> also for traffic/data, so I'm wondering if it would be better to do it
> with some more general protocol. Maybe BFD or in the IGP?
> For IPv6 one could perhaps use RAs?
> 
> Stig
> 
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Tina TSOU
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pim mailing list
> > pim@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim