IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16435127444; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h3tDprjE1uiX; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EC861273E2; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id n11so108386372wma.1; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Hle2NEUjspCa6SAq+Wf3RpZV4sBgRqnRhmyya9oUf4=; b=ut6DwppRkeuwP/WuU+0hhpcqS/Le7LGogcU7+Qld/eDQdIsBD963sPM7mhOBxEInAR 7ZZTr5TNTcLCZUvPQV6AJI1B32uQykl+0F6pyEwLTT9MaXoeWRHoC+I/M0nyBjNVW5+Y ExDW4if7YU1nDOhQEInaaKoS32s4xad98s/uvgcaI4bosic7IWXSk3ORr5xXQSCW47RC zr3wgkcYAbSzXR/66w/zRM6bnTJRrRSyHle7dI6w46CvfG7kXgpmNtYyn//OWeAEd1/j rIZRYTl+bQJMdxtEqp4FKC7T7RjdckOc/dKVOv6aSLzQblZS4NtQz4khHxTRCJDa9iDw 4MXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Hle2NEUjspCa6SAq+Wf3RpZV4sBgRqnRhmyya9oUf4=; b=ZCKx+heEJRDFD3btE4SUKbRq339w8AimprSKURC4J9f/8SO6VzxONdCdn4bmDRXV5m sxatBz41eSdcMDa02Fq+LH16WkebpakZp2JFEO+LQKhScc7nywn972gGZ5KEHs4jVUC2 huw3KyKQ+wuX2Ij4+9MPG37Eif0Q5M4laUk55NQGSNoPOqthteA9ukyACJnnCq1rITk8 /rz8t0TTQmTos0l2f4Kd1E0UcJHSyzMWlGL/R1QXxeIZzeFlf+8RVSkvgbVLzg6m0pj/ k/3aLhS/pJZGVN8BwyhX9y9ELdU7zGiTj10CeP8mjQzM5O5m13BKh5C4Iw3vn+gDS0lM 9hkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1ErMCOv1iDtjDhe3fvAn+UWX4+YuOBavugVdVMK/aSd6Ln5TD/T0/+Gr45tuxpYA==
X-Received: by 10.28.230.83 with SMTP id d80mr8419999wmh.18.1489661076045; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b199sm3828273wmb.13.2017.03.16.03.44.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <599257D7-532D-4512-929B-D124623EAF35@ericsson.com> <37ED3E78-B23A-4D29-8597-5A63236129B1@cisco.com> <887bd0f0-32a5-56f1-9ac9-703ecb97a760@gmail.com> <80D8FFF0-2674-48A7-A935-11681F5C5A4D@jisc.ac.uk> <A67E1C07-282B-4422-A2FF-86F6CACBD775@cable.comcast.com> <ab7c95a5-9776-24b5-7c26-4c5987d4c948@isi.edu> <ed2f5144-52fb-dda5-1fb4-62be1625b341@gmail.com> <401F52B1-3D41-4174-9425-50571B2D0B9E@jisc.ac.uk>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "Leddy, John" <John_Leddy@comcast.com>, "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6d51de4b-3a9d-0f34-1cd2-5bb30caed75e@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:44:35 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <401F52B1-3D41-4174-9425-50571B2D0B9E@jisc.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/72p9e1YTQb11GYolZh7JSrIJz-U>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:44:39 -0000

> In another form, the answer to John is that there are no protocol police,
> so what consenting adults do inside their own networks simply isn't an
> issue that an Internet-wide spec can or should address.

That is not quite true, the inability to gain an IANA allocated 
codepoint can make long
term private deployments very difficult, either for the protocol 
squatting on a codepoint
because they could not get one allocated, or to the deployment of a new 
protocol
legitimately allocated a conflicting codepoint.

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email