Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 29 May 2020 14:30 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF133A091E
for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 07:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id rIqSsMXGhm-k for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 29 May 2020 07:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E2C3A091C
for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 07:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id c14so1305672qka.11
for <6man@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 07:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to
:references; bh=zKHA1MwOI8HeoG78ddxORrt/g1RccRSpzJnr+G2m3os=;
b=HochPjMXrZRR2EnpYQa64KV3SCm+tTkSjgLJCHP+nn0d3XVy8F+HlKG3VPmEF+1s2C
NQPUstA4WKcNFeWTXP60TRK8Cm/C+G2ZogF6JUMkVQKNenmTGJ/gMq9/vnPbNOp8znL5
RWRtS9MD96E2lTrp2JjmkSsqmNS1vJNEjoVUMMs9MlHRU6fnchevHGocFqKse/qRdo/6
lYjUSA6npk+s6poPYXF77c5IdpeXgzZalwwnfvRqeXJcBSuhMeoHit3QKy8h0TzVUivl
693uHwrVn46F6Mj2qpNADRtZikFkicESSbhSZqRIpgboh7U/n3/NQjUXtZ7Vr4iMJbLB
pJgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date
:in-reply-to:cc:to:references;
bh=zKHA1MwOI8HeoG78ddxORrt/g1RccRSpzJnr+G2m3os=;
b=ewfAbFxc6exF+4HdBs9Mlw2w+abm3LKVROqMxNW1iQMtFjghSjsZ4MjIdYZjOs6zxl
MM6YlmzFoEOfRtBZJUDLNLGSly6+r8HnxDTzTCIQrpfQ3M/rUsg44disrdPuDlR+uIYy
x/PjQCOLGueSIfy7S15W62ASVvdHkhgsx1FERsRqtosyRRhe4Mj+i3dzUAfEwgJx4UC3
X8IztFFHeDbsIZCWZr0g+53O1Bx4O+DvyNTpmc/ZwjQOTR0OoAmVeZNH2NRI7nicEmfO
2YWjenIfeqX9jb+JtXIg2/U1dFiak2qKHTZZ6JPX31txB4/xWpPnmDvkb+FkA/OnIh5e
PSEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533A8xIs2zDYW/j/V/urCuJZ8ankuBk2erd4VJeKkY+WVOZCdOnY
GDvjjujNF3Khf/o/dDRwpLkMXg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGpq2sHvnbUf+INn3/yvfG1SHfC0S0Ewb92ozmV9gvYDcWewGtWi1T0YhdB7dJZI9aE1llog==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:bd81:: with SMTP id n123mr7664999qkf.57.1590762604307;
Fri, 29 May 2020 07:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:9567:3d83:ceca:52fe?
([2601:18b:300:36ee:9567:3d83:ceca:52fe])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h125sm7005906qkd.93.2020.05.29.07.30.02
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 29 May 2020 07:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <7AC15DBA-17DD-4CF7-95C1-0F1C6775BF30@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_ECE9601D-7F14-487D-9C75-E3137EF682F2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.13.2.1\))
Subject: Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 10:30:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <70CDD965-C9B4-4A15-9ACA-FFE685D97129@gmail.com>
Cc: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>,
6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
References: <CAO42Z2xDygUXTGwVunGSTMkZGMF8VePrPaXLSAJg14vAJdca5A@mail.gmail.com>
<6DB604C0-2C29-44A8-AB01-DA697552C7DA@employees.org>
<1C1F0496-33A8-4646-B356-369EA9ABAD33@gmail.com>
<DM6PR05MB6348501B266FF51DD805C25DAE8F0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
<70CDD965-C9B4-4A15-9ACA-FFE685D97129@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.13.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/7KZpYGXGqlaC3pcck2By-s5ydJU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>,
<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>,
<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 14:30:07 -0000
On May 29, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote: > My main point was that a list discussion of this type rarely reaches an acceptable outcome, and that an objective discussion at IETF is normally a better approach. Indeed resolving issues like this is exactly why we meet F2F at IETF. My experience with this is more that working group chairs are quite active in moderating discussions during in-person meetings, and really tend not to take responsibility for doing that on the mailing list. This produces the effect you’ve observed, that it’s easier to get consensus in-person than on the list. This is unfortunate; if the chairs took a more active role on the list, considering the cost of the time it takes for participants with coding jobs to follow multi-hundred-post repetitive arguments, we would probably do a better job of reaching consensus on-list. Of course, this is a lot of work, and it’s sort of understandable that it doesn’t happen; my point is simply that if we want to be an effective _online_ organization, maybe we need to start doing things a bit differently.
- So where have all these new 6man WG people come f… Mark Smith
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Andrew Alston
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… tom petch
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… otroan
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Philip Homburg
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Alexandre Petrescu
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Templin (US), Fred L
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Voyer, Daniel
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Templin (US), Fred L
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Bernier, Daniel
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Andrew Alston
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Nick Hilliard
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Xing Li
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Sander Steffann
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… otroan
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Adrian Farrel
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… 神明達哉
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Voyer, Daniel
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Ron Bonica
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Fernando Gont
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Turchanyi Geza
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Greg Mirsky
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Andrew Alston
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Need a journalist (Re: So where have all these ne… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Need a journalist (Re: So where have all thes… Ca By
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Andrew Alston
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Robert Raszuk
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Andrew Alston
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Robert Raszuk
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Andrew Alston
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Robert Raszuk
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Stewart Bryant
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Ron Bonica
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Stewart Bryant
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Fred Baker
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Ted Lemon
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Jared Mauch
- RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Ron Bonica
- One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have all… Toerless Eckert
- RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Greg Mirsky
- Re: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have… Toerless Eckert
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Greg Mirsky
- RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Mark Smith
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Robert Raszuk
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Mark Smith
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Robert Raszuk
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Ole Troan
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Stewart Bryant
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Stewart Bryant
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Carsten Bormann
- Re: So where have all these new 6man WG people co… Toerless Eckert
- Re: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have… Philip Homburg
- RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have… John Scudder
- RE: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: One size fits all !?! (was: Re: So where have… Philip Homburg