IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4443 (6153)

Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Mon, 22 February 2021 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E663A205E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:22:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lL9JLR9sp48S for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:22:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2a.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9820B3A205C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:22:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2a.google.com with SMTP id m9so14368013ybk.8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:22:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wB8sUf+SoSP4Cpr7pIcwcYAoGg8OxQ9NOcVsFYnVLs8=; b=bu+R166acXoM3V1zu+HGoMkbDWbKZwC6BbhAlL+fpdvpYRfy6fpyVPKdFqDL1w4qCi 20jeR59svGGLtthbknr6zZDL5w0Vx+KtyhvcQeigp6kKjb6ssvzIfrhAgePwkkOlzNCj wcVPQ74UlVKGjN3qMNrDENgYtUkq4D02EjsX5TvYB2O7A/wF9p/ZsXCOp0QWZHfIxNiC svDzI7x8YExN9OFtcdbIKJZgo+URnkRvHN+kQgMA3uVnR+Q5JkUThEouNpFC6ollJWvZ vc8AjgTiwy4FCNNYZWiNi5QXufHsXi6aC+Y716NfTNzROLMMUzzNUQhMcY4UT1hmlinN KQJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wB8sUf+SoSP4Cpr7pIcwcYAoGg8OxQ9NOcVsFYnVLs8=; b=gyuQpzvFy5baGS9h7B32dblFhHNjJiUgOKDGMkwIZfPgjMYMEM+fui14QVihTGQiCY /FhoL7JDCZ6JRXDdDOsa0btFBjSEW4hT8fvGbD2H5+pW7KTv+c0V5oODTbJ13R9OqSl5 TOGr6I7oWpraaHsu8OfQPTFr22vNLuffwEbf2LH50mHXxK0yoRtotxqr2kd68dE8Xhxq hUk6svKRnZZF1itRxfyqfjNnHNLqpiG9kyYrRf3CfrqY2mpgvnKOUUhatJ6pXTAYqW8f TrMnuTERZa1zdMXF2MGky0do6ibhU2Pskfo9LqvjC8XlLvg/uT7O7b1/N//BBDfRzJ1h c97g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531s0pANBTl53PIakIQj3/9KnLs5u/upnDlkONop+vUbUa1oaJVv lSQ05QeVBkTEppTLer23Ya/DczJG/znhEXYhUR0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIldNX1hlhtMua2NHOA+k0hcOKX30VbuiY1ewCbcZh93lYbwrrhem2cfbd2N0cJesgh2oCQq9ERkPYPaIlifk=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:e483:: with SMTP id b125mr37053885ybh.444.1614028968743; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:22:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALZ3u+aLw7Kmk5f7hXWYsFYi5YfKB7mZ3k9XCsHZnzT+9_xovw@mail.gmail.com> <80D0E6B0-42AA-45F3-8C21-2BCDC7B021AB@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <80D0E6B0-42AA-45F3-8C21-2BCDC7B021AB@employees.org>
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:22:37 +0300
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+Y4wcJKq3y--9ZKp2XHNOO7tA1kE-X3HuKjGco9gwxKng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4443 (6153)
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Daniel Ginsburg <dginsburg@gmail.com>, IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000056d61505bbf367c4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/7syTO3wBIvZc320Iwoyg3qqRIl0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 21:22:51 -0000

Peace,

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021, 11:50 PM Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> Töma,
>
> I have read your errata.
> I am not  sure I understand the ambiguity. Could you try to explain it in
> more detail
>

Consider a case when the source IP is link-local and the destination is
global, yet the routing happens in the same VLAN.

Per RFC 4007, the packet should be transmitted; however, RFC 4443 allows
for an ambiguity which is already causing vendors to reject packets in this
case.

--
Töma

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email