Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4443 (6153)

Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Mon, 22 February 2021 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41B13A20E7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:12:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87NSq7ACf2wq for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:12:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDC03A20E6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:12:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com with SMTP id p186so14541319ybg.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:12:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=69Sr9eB6rfj3q1jJCbHr6+fLI57JiJ3EKdRiHj9MkJM=; b=T43z7PnqOMAb+T8G1rzqzQR7GAgoAOkTcDSIMAM5x1OMuqJg9c/ctzK2aAPvrA2cEq rJv5At5Hw2b1wfzvHHgvs4jV/OfTc05alrhtv0gT2v22a065FzB1z4NJvaBNa0SKwSGo e0d1DzumRRRf4/HPkENHcaJ2y5oelX1PhGxx6bhR9ndM6xqUm+03kt7x1UkdFtDIgk3e 1aJfTpFse++E+9D+fxakV1pw/kQyv1w8st1kUgLcOxVeO0JiZuTa/8MnIQo5mjBCM1MA HuTHi4bi7zou4xKbEut7qJ0eb3P8V4WONnGLUgQxKfFrRVanFmEOMbXyUFF6X6BS3UvK XnjA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=69Sr9eB6rfj3q1jJCbHr6+fLI57JiJ3EKdRiHj9MkJM=; b=h0yZxNGwyrvYyxGl0fj9pVe3Verw6UtZ1I63fK0+sjVS/1SnM+Xl28TY/Be3dghzHr I5B+GFiGB5ze4mtqfGWtxMh+Y8YU0Z//ebq7Wh0uJ8LSg5TF1+TrMXd9F253u5wXDfqU xx1dZAQxhGzMJzwKMWsl4uG+/wqVFDtvUdz7Iu+9MOkg9PbGCLrokdENxc3k77DMRjDF PLCBOXuxONFdoXxS+3sGZjKd198hIwXCXKF5TRWPVUQM77VVSHeylzAZLKyuDMG4+/kh OREQM6Ag6wjvNOjPFXAXAyDSULOxOHuDHMaJX0iHakXH1ERKKiG7wZI0iAC3CiHrKlHa a3SQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KVnQ1DwGBqEsKN/MInePIQDspKaIz9cuq9S8OrSPwOFb8aKCn t2kCLCKbboe9yjGEM8cjJtaXqEpOCEQpw6AHwb4r4YiBnSE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvCb8zDkZK1C850HLopYVLJd9ghjYVzOunp48mjR2oSzL8AvTgu1Wz/R6AdDc1XTS6Sd09b2mAq4UnIT8qQPw=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b74c:: with SMTP id e12mr38751448ybm.20.1614031929697; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:12:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALZ3u+Y4wcJKq3y--9ZKp2XHNOO7tA1kE-X3HuKjGco9gwxKng@mail.gmail.com> <C7031BE1-0AE5-46FD-813C-EDAE1105AAEB@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <C7031BE1-0AE5-46FD-813C-EDAE1105AAEB@employees.org>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 01:11:56 +0300
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+YPnpdjMQfikKh7dfCQt0nPOVahP9LHgQKfk5ab_yg1Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4443 (6153)
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Daniel Ginsburg <dginsburg@gmail.com>, IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d369e505bbf4171b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/7wHUMLBxJxH_F4pe6PgE7rRPZ-U>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:12:12 -0000

Peace,

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021, 12:41 AM Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> It’s perfectly valid to send a packet with a link-local source and a
> global destination address, as long as the interface with the global
> address is on the same link.
>

I, too, think so, but RFC 4443, Section 3.1, says that a Destination
Unreachable Message should be sent in that case.

Which some of the (famous) vendors who have read the 4443 but haven't taken
a look on the 4007 are already doing.

--
Töma

>