IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-11.txt>

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 20 May 2016 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDA512B035 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2016 23:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.126
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dxfIUSHb20n0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2016 23:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D8BE12B031 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2016 23:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id x189so100336519ywe.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2016 23:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zcIoQI+hgXKIcx4IAMM6qH39jo2VhDHkzYIKV0hpK/E=; b=JQnWz3HX4mVQvAUDgP1Bl0irZ9NdZqi4WmG7OPaluvozZ5D30CoX0wMts9FQhIJW6F Z6YBAzYBzbtglmxkdyxkSdIZ73bv9aQPBtdXgyosU4hN+/bqsSPWQJpD5FWUxpz1GsuT UCufXVpT8PDYyxIw1vgcWJFJX6EDl0Dk9eeifB/FJRL88Jn10gSpOt6NWx+f0NaZIHiu yL9U8T4O3kP+af1MgpeJGhM8mbZxj4wL2EXRv4k7uV3K5YVSShvoQOls8ky1uSEiBQpe kCH4EKHyM0Y8uti02cmYmP+QR1zphowpetzECVVHbgcaRiyiua7lNTKv9m8oGDcgqnux 0hkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zcIoQI+hgXKIcx4IAMM6qH39jo2VhDHkzYIKV0hpK/E=; b=V0E6RIEmnJ4SC+p9NyhDe36ZfwlUl+Fp0p7MvfMO1AqspQu9OgctrXYDeayNERggNt xbJL4qtfZCHaKEqV5WUiWqYOWcrEMwjpTzRrblElg2BMZCTmByiMpcmc/JpMmIH3nJCj VutCIv6wGmieF9FmU/EkyXTB7TKXqloiDdPnPzMYWvgXQX4iptWGf3yy6Dbr3aju1GeB QlqD/IMDIOfc0AspYZJdKK6KdsqjEV5XQDHiC7FXJ8/RgdjH+bB80lK2YIpiqYedPKP+ BmP36iuITLMggLwrGjJ/DXpUQyT5ntsrvWHIFB6ODeQ5OaxQHFMXwOwZ18wn60AGkRIZ wlww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXwdH0yPxww5aO996ulTmWxeS/nMBEMlTO45b9xgmgkJFaA7JCRcsJP/7+KstAQe+st/XiR1nKJCa9KhtRg
X-Received: by 10.129.80.11 with SMTP id e11mr795233ywb.197.1463725184192; Thu, 19 May 2016 23:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.198.68 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2016 23:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a65c2157-044e-6207-314e-833313e5d458@gmail.com>
References: <20160428004904.25189.43047.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <89CA2C18-AE61-4D40-8997-221201835944@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqdZ_D7jsDdWQ2FJpLH9cXveYfcye0W2J_mSi-7bYBrOKA@mail.gmail.com> <B849F263-9F99-48E8-B903-8FE7D2CDF277@cooperw.in> <CAJE_bqd1AWOuwvQcGzHg+dAWoump29g14HEA1BoVErXDXSMxaw@mail.gmail.com> <573BCFD0.8090801@si6networks.com> <CAJE_bqfKUbO7C6LnxOOUCVBU9e679_=159Yu6Ti0zhOGDuw98Q@mail.gmail.com> <A1111BEA-C14C-4574-9214-3D9B5500FEA1@cooperw.in> <CAKD1Yr23S4yHM=31VXTJq7t11P3__GEbbRhM0c085gBjQEGi-Q@mail.gmail.com> <19ae94cd-849f-0622-54bc-42cbad51368a@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1YN6SnUNp0HKqTNg6G0egkLveCOTG_7pHo9Zq3OFP4=g@mail.gmail.com> <a65c2157-044e-6207-314e-833313e5d458@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 15:19:23 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0e3NuLCFK2N35FymoQmx4UUH-83rkQxtUB1RJbwNzY9A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-11.txt>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147d2b2a796f3053340134b"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/7y-yT-1DPGLUcbDPJ8ZDr2PeD7o>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 06:19:46 -0000

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Let's all always keep in mind that the current text of the draft says
> that
> > on every network, hosts SHOULD configure an IPv6 address that never
> changes
> > until the end of time. I think that recommendation is irresponsible.
>
> Thus, I'm continuing to run my laptop with only an RFC4941 address for a
> few
> days to see whether it has any negative impact at all. So far, so good.
>

Excellent! Now, if we can only make this draft stop saying that that you
SHOULD NOT do that...  :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email