IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues

Mini <mini@let.dyndns.tv> Thu, 03 May 2007 17:22 UTC

Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hjf0o-0000JQ-1C; Thu, 03 May 2007 13:22:38 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hjf0m-0000Bj-0G for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 13:22:36 -0400
Received: from static-87-79-236-249.netcologne.de ([87.79.236.249] helo=let.dyndns.tv) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hjf0i-0001ck-0i for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 13:22:35 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by let.dyndns.tv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC221D8170 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2007 19:22:31 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <m2sladlxtc.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
References: <03E9BB4F-EA33-4610-8B2C-81031FAC6C98@eads.net> <m2sladlxtc.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
X-Gpgmail-State: !signed
Message-Id: <78054AC6-3C81-44B5-AA3D-57B690E91B82@let.dyndns.tv>
From: Mini <mini@let.dyndns.tv>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:22:22 +0200
To: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b66a1e94d7d92973ece9e5da449ff80
Subject: Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1142517215=="
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org

On May 3, 2007, at 5:41 PM, gnn@neville-neil.com wrote:

> At Thu, 3 May 2007 13:41:12 +0200,
> Ebalard, Arnaud wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 1 mai 07 à 23:18, George V. Neville-Neil a écrit :
>>
>>> Actually I like this solution.
>>>
>>> Now, not to beat a dead horse more, but when can a draft be set  
>>> up to
>>> talk about this?
>>
>> I would already have pushed a submission but I'm not familiar with
>> the associated IETF process. I suspect it will take me quite some
>> time to do it the wrong way.
>>
>> Can someone more familiar with it initiate the submission? I'll be
>> happy to take part to the discussions and reviewing process.
>>
>
> I too can be involved in the draft, but also have never written one on
> my own.

hello gentleman,

found some answers about creating and submitting  RFCs here:

<http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcfaq.html>

some tips here

<ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-editor/instructions2authors.txt>

peace

marc

> Best,
> George

--
Development is when you know the answer, but not how to get there.
Applied research is when you know the question, but not the answer.
Pure research is when you don't know the question."

web: http://www.let.de
.local http://stattfernsehen.com





--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email