Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-grand-06: (with COMMENT)
Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Thu, 01 July 2021 12:08 UTC
Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172D53A0A9F; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 05:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6y-ZNaUtOGtg; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 05:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7825C3A0A92; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 05:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id w13so8162990edc.0; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 05:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xpSOOgI3yJUhilzAulw0nNSNTrwRgorIPvoBE/4YqT8=; b=I2+sYTvK88avEcgWVk5Xe+XXkaTICO+0bD7ZtMXxMbqOPe6NW+mQbXgzj7vQZblIq8 JJpm4puloekqqzOBFNSXEfmh4xwzAjF9wrbPaPWk4F63tygKqwt9ntlZtc+0w1SBeQCe I7d3Oq8Z8VkKriWXa3SXrzd0xDvPFnamxxAf8xMIt9Yvko7wLTN1pq4IlF4rEoRVoP8j h7ebJOjp8V6UwVwZmVvL3GTn/g4/xOFY36ODtaWfKf6vHI2hLq16LUbjBEXWhi38Mpqz cXRmZfixmxmklUuVbtRHBfTCmCyAPCPcF6m0xnlcOguvTLHuwKB0UG6VG5Srd9TkUdt0 Lo8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xpSOOgI3yJUhilzAulw0nNSNTrwRgorIPvoBE/4YqT8=; b=H83CgWPaIhj/TxIwPzrO2wG6DDGbHR9DH7otB5SCjdLvHzRVdJXLGuOXlyr062W/gp gqkEqyGm+IzfwBTueVbXsAKrSUeS7XE2RxhoY1imzcP/sDd85Xnh8D6vVnB9hvYZCNN8 undgcPC05B/saynlGtJzwyc2aEGxesStup19noD/iGOuYQ/rh9sQ5KuOQNC5d1NW5R21 +061hYWvMYJ9Gp+pc9Av/NNT0rmtajsifCiM+9gy5H9aRwo+5W8qJuIXGtEuSSY1WRFH WZkjUIB1qOVMr6FVNqfbhh+tXC/0gW1x9B4LmcxrkQKynGaPVrHq+QT3UKV/UNA2qU0A F5qw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jKf6IUbIEmcHYCv7+VA2S3xqCe7qtJ6JK1ST/girQX5O6zu2Q mRVe88JMX6d4uE419eNzMxzmXeWEQU+ZMjrltco=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxRPtCk18N5AoAlNyo9GTuyTQhFJuGCyaeMWmyeGKpXX5JdeaTOSOXjKnJO6ISCGF8bhSAgAE3+9kwPSbCxNWg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3181:: with SMTP id di1mr3596283edb.211.1625141329461; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162512790860.6559.14490468072475126698@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <162512790860.6559.14490468072475126698@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 22:08:36 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAT0O9nsuhs5FyNjvPfRKY+EM1fLYKaMYTwaPg2QjZAEpA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-grand-06: (with COMMENT)
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-6man-grand@ietf.org, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>, 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/8IBo17dun8v5_X3SGa87n8iGKAg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 12:08:56 -0000
Hi Robert, On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 6:25 PM Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > (1) I wasn't really familiar with the term "off-link" and I was wondering > whether it's definition should be imported here, although I note that ND does > define and use this term, so readers familiar with the ND RFC would presumably > be familiar with it. Yes, the idea of off-link and on-link addresses/communication is kind of fundamental for ND. I'll add the following text to the Terminology section: "On-link address: an address that is assigned to an interface on a specified link. See Section 2.1 of [RFC4861] for detailed definition. Off-link: the opposite of "on-link". See Section 2.1 of [RFC4861] for detailed definition." Would it make it better? > (2) I actually found the normative text updating RFC4861 in section 6.1.1 to > not be that readable, and I had to scan it a couple of times to spot the > distinction between router and host. Possibly laying out the text slightly > differently would make the distinction between host and router behaviour more > obvious. E.g., > > When a valid Neighbor Advertisement is received (either solicited or > unsolicited), the Neighbor Cache is searched for the target's entry. > If no entry exists: > > Hosts SHOULD silently discard the advertisement. There is no > need to create an entry if none exists, since the recipient has > apparently not initiated any communication with the target. > > Routers SHOULD create a new entry for the target address with > the link-layer address set to the Target link-layer address > option (if supplied). The entry's reachability state MUST be > set to STALE. If the received Neighbor Advertisement does not > contain the Target link-layer address option the advertisement > SHOULD be silently discarded. Done, -07 will have the updated text, thanks for the suggestion! -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
- Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-g… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
- Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6m… Jen Linkova
- RE: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6m… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6m… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6m… Jen Linkova
- on-link and off-link addresses, side discussion Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: on-link and off-link addresses, side discussi… Simon Hobson
- Re: on-link and off-link addresses, side discussi… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: on-link and off-link addresses, side discussi… Philip Homburg
- Re: on-link and off-link addresses, side discussi… Simon Hobson
- Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-6m… Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: why "is /64 [a] "default" prefix length when … Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: on-link and off-link Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: on-link and off-link Philip Homburg
- RE: on-link and off-link Vasilenko Eduard
- RE: on-link and off-link Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- RE: on-link and off-link Vasilenko Eduard
- RE: on-link and off-link Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: why "is /64 [a] "default" prefix length when … Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: on-link and off-link Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- RE: on-link and off-link Vasilenko Eduard