Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-00.txt
Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Fri, 09 July 2021 22:11 UTC
Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A435B3A30C7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.238
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.238 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.338, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydM90tVh5IbE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77A043A30C6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: ipv6@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 169MBWlS006905 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 23:11:33 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8] claimed to be crumpet.local
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-00.txt
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-7@u-1.phicoh.com>, ipv6@ietf.org
References: <162545101341.19246.8566193740265797873@ietfa.amsl.com> <95a7dbe5-e0a3-4676-9dcc-005ff53725e0@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMD3iSgo-KMM5Ed8bVnVCu_G3f2kB6zHKoOx2ta=x8QucA@mail.gmail.com> <CANMZLAbmdWHDRBPpHgy_e4_0-WUVW2gjnbXWwu2pF_xi-S0vWQ@mail.gmail.com> <87a6n13y0j.fsf@ungleich.ch> <CA+9kkMBx4F0FGZasdk11ogyCOwQZecAEkO4JbECDr4osySN-4w@mail.gmail.com> <01289d8c-a470-1867-448f-3d616647ba5f@gmail.com> <87bl7flww8.fsf@ungleich.ch> <6771.1625578366@localhost> <m1m19WD-0000EXC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <e90a069c-873f-6c93-29f0-b69c9430b66b@gmail.com> <m1m1Qie-0000FLC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <26758.1625758150@localhost> <54c7739a-6fb6-7e20-7b9f-3c1a8b6a613b@gmail.com> <11473.1625790920@localhost> <967177aa-a740-72b6-e0e5-32fc62d27831@gmail.com> <7697.1625850036@localhost> <282fc0e8-10db-4c86-7483-87b4b0ff5ee8@gmail.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <726877d3-3bce-6541-162d-82cbc334d29f@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 23:11:31 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.48
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <282fc0e8-10db-4c86-7483-87b4b0ff5ee8@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/8W2NvRtQJcs4L1uPubjbmx_T9HQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 22:11:47 -0000
Brian E Carpenter wrote on 09/07/2021 22:10: > C:\WINDOWS\system32>ping ::1%0 > > Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data: > Reply from ::1: time<1ms > > so I guess interface 0 is the loopback, but it is listed nowhere as such. this really is odd. The loopback interface is technically interface 1: > C:\Users\nick>netsh interface ipv6 show address > > Interface 1: Loopback Pseudo-Interface 1 > > Addr Type DAD State Valid Life Pref. Life Address > --------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------------------ > Other Preferred infinite infinite ::1 and: > C:\Users\nick>route print > =========================================================================== > Interface List > 4...00 xx xx xx xx xx ......Intel(R) 82574L Gigabit Network Connection > 1...........................Software Loopback Interface 1 > =========================================================================== and using more up-to-date tools: > PS C:\WINDOWS\system32> get-netipinterface -InterfaceIndex 1 > > ifIndex InterfaceAlias AddressFamily NlMtu(Bytes) InterfaceMetric Dhcp ConnectionState PolicyStore > ------- -------------- ------------- ------------ --------------- ---- --------------- ----------- > 1 Loopback Pseudo-Interface 1 IPv6 4294967295 75 Disabled Connected ActiveStore > 1 Loopback Pseudo-Interface 1 IPv4 4294967295 75 Disabled Connected ActiveStore > > > PS C:\WINDOWS\system32> get-netipinterface -InterfaceIndex 0 > get-netipinterface : No MSFT_NetIPInterface objects found with property 'InterfaceIndex' equal to '0'. Verify the > value of the property and retry. > At line:1 char:1 > + get-netipinterface -InterfaceIndex 0 > + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > + CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (0:UInt32) [Get-NetIPInterface], CimJobException > + FullyQualifiedErrorId : CmdletizationQuery_NotFound_InterfaceIndex,Get-NetIPInterface > > PS C:\WINDOWS\system32> "ping ::1%0" works, but "ping ::1%1" returns a general failure. But if you attempt to scope a global IP address to the interface ID that the fe80: address is tied to, it will also fail. So, not clear what the scope ID actually refers to here. Someone with more windows clue is going to have to answer this one, and you're right that there's a fairly deep lack of documentation on how this is supposed to work. Nick
- Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Ted Hardie
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nico Schottelius
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Ted Hardie
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nick Hilliard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874… Michael Richardson
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nico Schottelius
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874… Ted Hardie
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Ted Hardie
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Jared Mauch
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nico Schottelius
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nico Schottelius
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Carsten Bormann
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Jared Mauch
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Ted Hardie
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Philip Homburg
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Philip Homburg
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Andrew Cady
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nick Hilliard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Nick Hilliard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Michael Richardson
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-0… Brian E Carpenter