Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-grand-01 - additional security concerns

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 31 July 2020 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4013A0A20; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WbxZ4fRJeEIj; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89EF63A0BD0; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id p14so8937725wmg.1; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=t84pnbmpmpPA+lTeT8QRhbojyA5i/sOyFAEdupOzB08=; b=JRRKnlGFVW3lz0iYNBrrc3l/LphNfOpW71WrsSIIvK2V3AsPt6PIILv/hpE4SCvayL 17IjxzDmx3vBU746fbvadAamaW7y5p6SYZNHI0o26YcqT6NfzzLHrwW2zICr1XIhjaMD 4jzwJaaFd/UatLZJyGcXGAK3/HXylY2708eY+a8rKS1JmWh9tgSMe5BxhbUmY6im9ubC ITwVDeZ59YnOr1G95hq1BHy9RuUCDk4GUMuaCxRHpPqecHWEe0IifXNmEKAMfasIgrTd 1N0l/8IqdnOqrROmjwFp7R/Tcxwq285JYJQgxBiezdFDypUMThetA3eeX0rjQS1Etoqd +5jg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=t84pnbmpmpPA+lTeT8QRhbojyA5i/sOyFAEdupOzB08=; b=Rvdef85AObEU6GGvNk7QpSEY271erpPUlhAumNsEL2A4Xbr04VSk9CYhMb3cSt+Od5 8I/PXrwTcTH/z1Dww4borFiU5/4QEWmopaH/LsP6HrH8vPt1YrvfMYbvhESrs6aCYHkK 3xOI/ASWwM4rktGGhYJA3gV9ngGGyUferfz70B9XzUCcut0y5zR0SpcU05tNjooApwNW BPTC2xEUfFfUQfH9YhYzeOc3CgkJLRgtqgwFGuvE6k5JFlzidOl73VqpdxLp0PrO4JCI L6hg76MzLO6RMuXGE8gLwD6GLch9K6ZtqD/mWyEb65LGBP3Sn+KVJWC2d8VyoRN++5gL li9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rwvUzEy3hrPJVvqSnzZGxLSWRYBwfhyf/09Rdiz32BKnVlWbD PQm6uATxSp9Dueo1A+jJX5Zs54MQ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNZSGTeSk+uPAWlPhoTvPd3PLyZb4eG+q7QKz0g+mMaDtVpGzcDdZNr0E1fYsAQI7aoQXMhQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:5416:: with SMTP id i22mr4469672wmb.172.1596210705736; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.199] (c-24-5-53-184.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.53.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u1sm15314777wrb.78.2020.07.31.08.51.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <E0C618C6-23C6-4C79-A949-D04B5FFADB17@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_67C18D59-6431-4ABE-8CB5-C6350AD4B6F4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-grand-01 - additional security concerns
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:51:40 -0700
In-Reply-To: <94D12FD5-3A0A-4278-A229-F0D88EC906D6@fugue.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <96fa6d80137241dd9b57fcd871c8a897@huawei.com> <CAFU7BARePzdeU5DFgoOWyrF0xZCj67_xkC2t8vMN2nH0d8aUig@mail.gmail.com> <37e2a7110f6b423eba0303811913f533@huawei.com> <CAFU7BATiD8RkiWXjrxGuAJU-BUwRQCErYZivUPZ-Mc_up_qGxQ@mail.gmail.com> <aebc46c9b813477b9ae0db0ef33e7bd9@huawei.com> <CAO42Z2yL7+GbO6QRaNzFYoBXLF-JZ2NfwgTTt2zerKhJLwt2Lw@mail.gmail.com> <3C1ECB6F-E667-4200-964F-AB233A0A56E9@cisco.com> <91D98D51-4045-4331-A711-8387ECE73400@fugue.com> <F56A89D4-0DA3-4A9B-ADC1-FC51ECAB193B@delong.com> <94D12FD5-3A0A-4278-A229-F0D88EC906D6@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/8lIHUyk9r7zEaCgKvXPP9zNUfFE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:52:05 -0000

Hi,

It’s fine to talk about how to improve ND in this list.

However, please change the subject, I don’t think it’s relevant to "I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-grand-01”

Bob



> On Jul 31, 2020, at 8:43 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> On Jul 31, 2020, at 11:30 AM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>> 1.	Public wifi networks (e.g. coffee houses, etc.)
> 
> The BCP for this case is to isolate clients.
> 
>> 2.	College/University settings (some v6 traction here, but often not on student-device accessible LANs)
> 
> For this it would be to give each dorm room its own subnet.
> 
>> 3.	Other networks which must admit untrusted clients/devices
> 
> E.g. home networks? Or something else?
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------