Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with DISCUSS)
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 22 January 2014 22:31 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319B31A0460; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:31:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.435
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uxTNNNtGmkXe; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0CE1A0242; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46059BE47; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:31:14 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E4owoRYNu4XN; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:31:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.3] (unknown [86.44.74.137]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B569BE39; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:31:12 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <52E046B0.1000701@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:31:12 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with DISCUSS)
References: <20140122202434.30069.4084.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52E02EAD.1050009@si6networks.com> <52E03BAD.5050306@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <52E03BAD.5050306@innovationslab.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:31:19 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/22/2014 09:44 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: >>> 1) Recording the addresses a node has visited during its >>> lifetime would somehow be ironic for a document aiming at >>> privacy. Just get the document compromised, and you get a list >>> of where the node has been since it was first installed. > I think I can get a list of where a device has been from any number > of places. So, I don't buy that argument at all. > I buy the argument. Some vendors have been beaten up for it now and then. Making that worse while trying to make privacy better would be a shame, no? S. [1] http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/apr/20/iphone-tracking-prompts-privacy-fears -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS4EatAAoJEC88hzaAX42ioFEH/juQiyETbJga5sKS6IyjAqtF 1m7qzYKEYQyI380xCO1Hy1CCW3nx7D5de7hlbpGAjnyIW8VzUjgAhopWqNhSg6x3 QlPm/9W39oqEuaJvsqWv8O/hwbSMPwUHCsR+7uhET/PrMXAIB4pyJp/g3qn3RijY JkBGMBAnJ6R9lGisGaXr4h7xrJZSI0a98q4dVEj07R6GHFuPlV+JSFt0bnXKZgOi XepYr9lVZ4MDTGqOg9Qdrj8SC1qk7XuRS1DeaXjnN2Go5wQMybsA3UPta6AdSXRM sleK5eziKYuuvPwRFRAHWfJEaMuLUdhNnlFd7L7e8OtOnMFu00MO2qqtf5JdAeU= =w4PC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stabl… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Fernando Gont
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Fernando Gont
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Fernando Gont
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Fernando Gont
- Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stabl… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Brian Haberman