Re: Link-local IPv6 addresses in URIs

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Fri, 18 November 2011 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2F121F8ACA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:50:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0QF2qYuqVAf6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:50:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163ED21F8A6C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:50:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach.fuaim.com [206.197.161.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B3C880AA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clemson.jhuapl.edu (unknown [128.244.243.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F83B130003 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EC662BC.40607@innovationslab.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:50:52 -0500
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Link-local IPv6 addresses in URIs
References: <CABOxzu0np9tCJgurrL6zCc1CpHd6KbrUdwnL5UocE6TM8a_G2w@mail.gmail.com> <4EC0E1FD.6050107@gmail.com> <4EC494EB.4070000@gmail.com> <880C9B8D-9DCD-4ED7-8FA0-5BBDBB37E25E@tzi.org> <CABOxzu1Rwj9Aa8oOZcqQDHVef52R04FcXBo6HwzCubvss=WGuw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH=tA5s1zEhcUm6y1E+BU0VLEiu+qHFTJATPpd+_GKf7JNtwXw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH=tA5s1zEhcUm6y1E+BU0VLEiu+qHFTJATPpd+_GKf7JNtwXw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:50:58 -0000

On 11/17/11 9:27 PM, Tomoyuki Sahara wrote:
> 
>   - FYI, there was an attempt to define textual representation of zone id:
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipngwg-scoping-arch-04#section-12

Published as RFC 4007 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4007).

Regards,
Brian