Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Wed, 22 February 2017 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8611A1296EE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:02:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umn.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEz2PuwE9oxb for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:02:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta-p7.oit.umn.edu (mta-p7.oit.umn.edu [134.84.196.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3E9412997D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta-p7.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49221BEF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:02:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at umn.edu
Received: from mta-p7.oit.umn.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta-p7.oit.umn.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BK8d5tVvdYiX for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:02:00 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail-ua0-f199.google.com (mail-ua0-f199.google.com [209.85.217.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-p7.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1881FBE8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:01:59 -0600 (CST)
Received: by mail-ua0-f199.google.com with SMTP id 48so6604017uaf.7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:01:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0urM+5cYuChWCIZfibMHsHKtzTmzUp13fQZKIz2q/GA=; b=QsuNtWAPMWeAfWBh3vBMKtVd/rNKIk78zMM5giId8hIr7VQORNnW5dXzFWoUwQ70bN qlWiXRYFJEb04T75fpeE68TRiaaQbqNfuNS/izsyaURu84QuJtyHkbncRKPiTN7DIDUG TFLm6m8YlaruSZ9rIKnrUCHtbhEJHjfOw3y2qYK7rLhqNWBp8xlaRL/jx80lWT1V3xHU ZPC2Ryi9RKUM0o2lVbsHNSsVXbqIqkyWsM0eJs3M4Fi9XNpG7V/qXQDQ5QzVuzkuPJzB FWzgbVLEx6zmC9TiHYv1cxJR0kXCHPMs48yLEDP1qRBEGRsfYLaz6ndx1lkrUJUDBwX9 q0BA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0urM+5cYuChWCIZfibMHsHKtzTmzUp13fQZKIz2q/GA=; b=BxIFtfQVU68XddRYh3Hm03USazej1wwhryKXFq3qUsDH6PWa/xEFzhPAEu20StDYx/ Llkvh1m8TX+1tBXisXXWCRgmdOBXeYCGt8Na4km4gY9aHbnusRf7+44scx1Q1XE2GxVi H8hHsjP13Gq9n20rrgXf+ZY8EECeSCLWSMkPpt7nvwgmAltR1ivOn5OoIHVz5nTM0mWv dRU8H/v3q5nfJ9fnsfFBtBkriSCrWwJ00RHRoeDCNm2/wZVmOcRtdk4H4jSL/xeFrlCd k6iZC8hxfhzYg5QTV1VGTSKfnHfaPeuBMPsSprf8MTEJ2O8lPX1VjtTzUzluV6k+ycjV Kj7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kDcqrKoE3O7tr37ibidIi32NZBwOrR1VIJ+9q/+jg2+npqfhv4+C6ObgLuhmwamL8wzwkeVyoZVAEaykH6VQUKibkjrmgoN+h9Hjm99sm/rgWXk5kjkM7Td6UJju+UQJmNwXi3ZkWFNxA=
X-Received: by 10.176.5.200 with SMTP id e66mr8830434uae.108.1487786519481; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:01:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.176.5.200 with SMTP id e66mr8830414uae.108.1487786519259; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:01:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.89.71 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:01:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr3pNBCNFRkZiDYoOp7CDDG-4pbuzkLW8UeJB_bbS7QEWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <m2lgt6ed7j.wl-randy@psg.com> <4514E052-25C1-4C85-AB1D-0B53FD9DA0E1@employees.org> <CAN-Dau3VriYNUf96yZEFMMV+-4WCxBz94Lkqfg3OsCUAbVYhaw@mail.gmail.com> <660929B4-158B-453F-9B5F-6C029F9699FA@employees.org> <E093E86F-41F5-4485-A8D3-761831F9AAF8@google.com> <ECF27195-4A6B-4AFC-8950-83876F333BD4@employees.org> <20170220235734.GA84656@Vurt.local> <CAKD1Yr3p=8b9Dmmb9GvGMq1u00xnE2ScmaF_a3FJXiteL=ZhBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170221172739.GT84656@Vurt.local> <CAO42Z2xEqnz4=E7JDOA_FCg_RxkMuZgnBc3KuaxwY1oZryed9g@mail.gmail.com> <20170221202821.GB32367@Vurt.local> <CAO42Z2yK_rZksa4xQkuW8Q_hwaitH610m6kVBmFisN7toaSoPw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3pNBCNFRkZiDYoOp7CDDG-4pbuzkLW8UeJB_bbS7QEWw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:01:58 -0600
Message-ID: <CAN-Dau1e0uac2qkxW-6xk-ToYROw6ipkQV3RjtMqFm6RuWq0EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1239a0fbdd0e0549224ac2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/9KLgL7NoXEC0gE9AJQtYy2TFexY>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:02:03 -0000

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>;
wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>;
> wrote:
>
>> Let's leave behind unnecessary practices that have been used to extend
>> IPv4's life, and that make things unnecessarily complicated and more costly
>> to operate and troubleshoot.
>>
>
> What he said.
>

Yes, what he said is a very compelling argument to use /64 in most places,
the default. However, you cannot extrapolate there exists no places were
something other than /64 make sense.

-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================