Archive

Le 19/01/2021 à 18:21, Jan Zorz - Go6 a écrit :
[...]
> I would say that for single phone - /64 is enough as that's a single 
> host and I would not bother suggesting regulators to change that.

A single phone with a single interface concerned about IPv6 maybe one 
/64 is enough.

But a single phone with multiple interfaces concerned about IPv6 (e.g.
its cellular interface, its WiFi interface in AP mode and a virtual
interface for an internal virtual machine) - do you still think one /64
is enough?

Alex

> 
> However, if PDPv6 context is established and end-device is able to 
> send DHCPv6-PD request - then the system should react and assign to 
> that device a routable /56 - but that's the way PPPoE works today
> and mobile access should be no different. From what I remember -
> mobile routers already support DHCPv6-PD request - it's just a matter
> if mobile operator is actually listening on DPDv6 "tunnel" for that 
> request and react to it.
> 
> Maybe people from mobile equipment vendors can chime in and tell us 
> if that's supported or not.
> 
> Cheers, Jan
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>  IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative 
> Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Informed regulator about the shorter-than-64 necessity on 3G/4G/5G